217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7983118)
1. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses.
Kärrholm J; Borssén B; Löwenhielm G; Snorrason F
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 Nov; 76(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 7983118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Good long term results with a cemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium].
Eingartner C; Ihm A; Maurer F; Volkmann R; Weise K; Weller S
Unfallchirurg; 2002 Sep; 105(9):804-10. PubMed ID: 12232740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High osteolysis and revision rate with the hydroxyapatite-coated ABG hip prostheses: 65 hips in 56 young patients followed for 5-9 years.
Blacha J
Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Jun; 75(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 15260419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.
Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre.
Hook S; Moulder E; Yates PJ; Burston BJ; Whitley E; Bannister GC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Dec; 88(12):1584-90. PubMed ID: 17159168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cemented Charnley revision arthroplasty for severe femoral osteolysis.
Raut VV; Siney PD; Wroblewski BM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 May; 77(3):362-5. PubMed ID: 7744915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders.
Malkani AL; Settecerri JJ; Sim FH; Chao EY; Wallrichs SL
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 May; 77(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 7744913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision for aseptic stem loosening using the cemented Charnley prosthesis. A review of 351 hips.
Raut VV; Siney PD; Wroblewski BM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Jan; 77(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 7822390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
Fink B; Grossmann A
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined survivorship and multivariate analyses of revisions in 799 hip prostheses. A 10- to 20-year review of mechanical loosening.
Johnsson R; Franzén H; Nilsson LT
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 May; 76(3):439-43. PubMed ID: 8175849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cemented revision for femoral osteolysis in cemented arthroplasties. Results in 29 hips after a mean 8.5-year follow-up.
Pierson JL; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 Jan; 76(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 8300679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Micromotion of femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized study of cemented, hydroxyapatite-coated, and porous-coated stems with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.
Kärrholm J; Malchau H; Snorrason F; Herberts P
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1994 Nov; 76(11):1692-705. PubMed ID: 7962030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
