These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7983209)

  • 1. Construct validity of neuropsychological tests of conceptual and attentional abilities.
    O'Donnell JP; Macgregor LA; Dabrowski JJ; Oestreicher JM; Romero JJ
    J Clin Psychol; 1994 Jul; 50(4):596-600. PubMed ID: 7983209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factorial structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.
    Greve KW; Brooks J; Crouch JA; Williams MC; Rice WJ
    Br J Clin Psychol; 1997 May; 36(2):283-5. PubMed ID: 9167868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factor analysis of the Intermediate Category Test.
    Livingston RB; Gray RM; Haak RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):851-5. PubMed ID: 8961322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Construct validity of various verbal and visual memory tests.
    Larrabee GJ; Curtiss G
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):536-47. PubMed ID: 7593474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A note of caution for clinicians using the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task.
    Ward T
    Br J Clin Psychol; 1997 May; 36(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 9167871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental norms for the Wisconsin Card Sorting test.
    Chelune GJ; Baer RA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1986 Jun; 8(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 3722348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationships between measures of auditory verbal learning and executive functioning.
    Vanderploeg RD; Schinka JA; Retzlaff P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Apr; 16(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 8021311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in performance and learning proficiency on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in schizophrenia: do they reflect distinct neurocognitive subtypes with distinct functional profiles?
    Kurtz MM; Wexler BE
    Schizophr Res; 2006 Jan; 81(2-3):167-71. PubMed ID: 16243489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive performance in learning disabled children with and without epilepsy.
    Vermeulen J; Kortstee SW; Alpherts WC; Aldenkamp AP
    Seizure; 1994 Mar; 3(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 8044448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and evaluation of CHIPASAT, an attention test for children: II. Test-retest reliability and practice effect for a normal sample.
    Dyche GM; Johnson DA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Apr; 72(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 1852565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Construct validity of the continuous attention test for children.
    Christensen KM; Joschko M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2001 May; 15(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 11528542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive validity of a preschool neurodevelopmental instrument.
    Blackman JA; Bretthauer J; Gressard RP; Nelson RP
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1992 Apr; 13(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 1577956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Course of attention and memory after common whiplash: a two-years prospective study with age, education and gender pair-matched patients.
    Di Stefano G; Radanov BP
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1995 May; 91(5):346-52. PubMed ID: 7639063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Latent structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test after pediatric traumatic head injury.
    Kizilbash A; Donders J
    Child Neuropsychol; 1999 Dec; 5(4):224-9. PubMed ID: 10925706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problem-solving abilities in unipolar depressed patients: comparison of performance on the modified version of the Wisconsin and the California sorting tests.
    Fossati P; Ergis AM; Allilaire JF
    Psychiatry Res; 2001 Nov; 104(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 11711168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Construct validity in the Trail Making Test: what makes Part B harder?
    Gaudino EA; Geisler MW; Squires NK
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 7593473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Trail Making Test A and B: a technical note on structural nonequivalence.
    Rossini ED; Karl MA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Apr; 78(2):625-6. PubMed ID: 8022690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factor structure of the Hooper Visual Organization Test: a cross-cultural replication and extension.
    Merten T
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Jan; 20(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 15620818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An initial validation of the Virtual Reality Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test in a college sample.
    Parsons TD; Courtney CG
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():15-23. PubMed ID: 24184058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the Category Test.
    Pendleton MG; Heaton RK
    J Clin Psychol; 1982 Apr; 38(2):392-6. PubMed ID: 7068880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.