These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7983272)

  • 1. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2664-73. PubMed ID: 7983272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.
    McKay CM; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 9921661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: the effect of modulation depth.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1777-85. PubMed ID: 7699159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
    Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitch of amplitude-modulated irregular-rate stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Long CJ; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1516-28. PubMed ID: 14514205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users: Channel Independence in Apical Cochlear Regions.
    Griessner A; Schatzer R; Steixner V; Rajan GP; Zierhofer C; Távora-Vieira D
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211020645. PubMed ID: 34041983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated intracochlear electrical pulses in deaf cats.
    Snyder RL; Vollmer M; Moore CM; Rebscher SJ; Leake PA; Beitel RE
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Jul; 84(1):166-83. PubMed ID: 10899194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 18367697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
    Pieper SH; Bahmer A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
    Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users.
    Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):656-9. PubMed ID: 20136187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch.
    Cariani PA; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 76(3):1717-34. PubMed ID: 8890287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.
    Litvak L; Delgutte B; Eddington D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):368-79. PubMed ID: 11508961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal pitch percepts elicited by dual-channel stimulation of a cochlear implant.
    Macherey O; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):339-49. PubMed ID: 20058981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.