163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7983272)
1. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees.
McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2664-73. PubMed ID: 7983272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.
McKay CM; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):347-57. PubMed ID: 9921661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: the effect of modulation depth.
McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1777-85. PubMed ID: 7699159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pitch of amplitude-modulated irregular-rate stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Long CJ; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1516-28. PubMed ID: 14514205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users: Channel Independence in Apical Cochlear Regions.
Griessner A; Schatzer R; Steixner V; Rajan GP; Zierhofer C; Távora-Vieira D
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211020645. PubMed ID: 34041983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated intracochlear electrical pulses in deaf cats.
Snyder RL; Vollmer M; Moore CM; Rebscher SJ; Leake PA; Beitel RE
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Jul; 84(1):166-83. PubMed ID: 10899194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.
Middlebrooks JC
J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 18367697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
Pieper SH; Bahmer A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users.
Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):656-9. PubMed ID: 20136187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch.
Cariani PA; Delgutte B
J Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 76(3):1717-34. PubMed ID: 8890287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.
Litvak L; Delgutte B; Eddington D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):368-79. PubMed ID: 11508961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal pitch percepts elicited by dual-channel stimulation of a cochlear implant.
Macherey O; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):339-49. PubMed ID: 20058981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
