These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7983274)

  • 1. Intensity discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Schroder AC; Viemeister NF; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2683-93. PubMed ID: 7983274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relation between the growth of loudness and high-frequency excitation.
    Hellman RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2655-63. PubMed ID: 7983271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intensity perception. XIV. Intensity discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Braida LD; Durlach NI; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2575-86. PubMed ID: 8270735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abnormal speech processing in frequency regions where absolute thresholds are normal for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.
    Léger AC; Moore BC; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):95-103. PubMed ID: 23104012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Growth of loudness in listeners with cochlear hearing losses: recruitment reconsidered.
    Buus S; Florentine M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 3(2):120-39. PubMed ID: 12162363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Cochlear Damage on the Sensitivity to Harmonicity.
    Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory filter shapes of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners in continuous broadband noise.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3127-37. PubMed ID: 8300951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
    Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing.
    Horwitz AR; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):409-16. PubMed ID: 11831814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation.
    Nelson DA; Schmitz JL; Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF; Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2393-414. PubMed ID: 8865646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral weights for sample discrimination as a function of overall level.
    Leibold LJ; Tan H; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):339-46. PubMed ID: 19173421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Otoacoustic emissions and recruitment].
    Konopka W; Olszewski J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2005; 59(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 16471192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intensity discrimination as a function of level and frequency and its relation to high-frequency hearing.
    Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Nov; 74(5):1375-9. PubMed ID: 6643849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking.
    Florentine M; Fastl H; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 3411048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity resolution and loudness in high-pass noise.
    Schlauch RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2171-9. PubMed ID: 8201113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1796-806. PubMed ID: 8817905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Souza PE; Forget LN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2568-76. PubMed ID: 7714274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.