These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7983274)

  • 21. Psychometric functions for level discrimination in cochlearly impaired and normal listeners with equivalent-threshold masking.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Zwicker T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):853-61. PubMed ID: 7642824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 200(1-2):115-31. PubMed ID: 15668043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners.
    Ludvigsen C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1271-80. PubMed ID: 4056221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detection of a temporal gap in low-frequency narrow-band signals by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    DeFilippo CL; Snell KB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Nov; 80(5):1354-8. PubMed ID: 3782613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus.
    Paul BT; Bruce IC; Roberts LE
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():170-182. PubMed ID: 27888040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Suppression and the dynamic range of hearing.
    Plack CJ; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):976-82. PubMed ID: 8445132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Frequency discrimination at 1200 Hz in the presence of high-frequency masking noise.
    Nelson DA; Stanton ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):660-4. PubMed ID: 7085971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Forward-masked intensity discrimination: duration effects and spectral effects.
    Schlauch RS; Lanthier N; Neve J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jul; 102(1):461-7. PubMed ID: 9228808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the Pitch Strength of Bandpass Noise in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Horbach M; Verhey JL; Hots J
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787067. PubMed ID: 30009682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Leensen MCJ; de Laat JAPM; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):844-853. PubMed ID: 28587489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Masker laterality and cueing in forward-masked intensity discrimination.
    Schlauch RS; Clement BR; Ries DT; DiGiovanni JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):822-8. PubMed ID: 9972567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Linearized response growth inferred from growth-of-masking slopes in ears with cochlear hearing loss.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Apr; 101(4):2186-201. PubMed ID: 9104021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Two experiments on subtle mid-frequency hearing loss and its influence on word discrimination in noise-exposed listeners.
    Humes LE; Schwartz DM; Bess FH
    Audiology; 1979; 18(4):307-19. PubMed ID: 475663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Smoski WJ; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1541-7. PubMed ID: 3711453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Audiometric and histological differences between the effects of continuous and impulsive noise exposures.
    Hamernik RP; Ahroon WA; Hsueh KD; Lei SF; Davis RI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2088-95. PubMed ID: 8473621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency glide discrimination in the F2 region by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3825-32. PubMed ID: 7790660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.