These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7983462)

  • 21. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17079092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When good news leads to bad choices.
    McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML; Ludvig EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jan; 105(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 26781050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement.
    Bailey JT; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):409-22. PubMed ID: 2341823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preferences for and against stimuli paired with food.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Jul; 72(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 10418156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 7714448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acquisition versus steady state in the time-left experiment.
    Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16343806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Control of matching by differential outcome expectancies in the absence of differential sample-outcome associations: a serial compound view.
    Demarse TB; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):449-66. PubMed ID: 16248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Amount-dependent temporal discounting?
    Ong EL; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15157973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contingency discriminability and the generalized matching law describe choice on concurrent ratio schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 22414348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.
    Grace RC; Bedell MA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 12083678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Suboptimal criterion setting in a perceptual choice task with asymmetric reinforcement.
    Stüttgen MC; Kasties N; Lengersdorf D; Starosta S; Güntürkün O; Jäkel F
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jun; 96():59-70. PubMed ID: 23466903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Choice with frequently changing food rates and food ratios.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):246-74. PubMed ID: 24403110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the discriminability of stimulus duration.
    McCarthy D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Mar; 33(2):187-211. PubMed ID: 7365407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Time left: linear versus logarithmic subjective time.
    Gibbon J; Church RM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):87-107. PubMed ID: 7241054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporal discrimination and a free-operant psychophysical procedure.
    Stubbs DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Mar; 33(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 7365406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice.
    Kheramin S; Body S; Herrera FM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 156(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 15474659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Context effects on choice.
    Goldshmidt JN; Lattal KM; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Nov; 70(3):301-20. PubMed ID: 9821681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.