87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7983559)
1. Mechanical evaluation of six types of reconstruction following 25, 50, and 75% resection of the proximal femur.
Kohles SS; Markel MD; Rock MG; Chao EY; Vanderby R
J Orthop Res; 1994 Nov; 12(6):834-43. PubMed ID: 7983559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical characteristics of proximal femoral reconstruction after 50% resection.
Markel MD; Gottsauner-Wolf F; Rock MG; Frassica FJ; Chao EY
J Orthop Res; 1993 May; 11(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 8326440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fixation of femoral allograft/prosthesis composites after 25%, 50% and 75% resection.
Kohles SS; Markel MD; Rock MG; Chao EY; Vanderby R
Med Eng Phys; 1996 Mar; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 8673317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of allograft/endoprosthetic composites with a step-cut or transverse osteotomy configuration.
Markel MD; Wood SA; Bogdanske JJ; Rapoff AJ; Kalscheur VL; Bouvy BM; Rock MG; Chao EY; Vanderby R
J Orthop Res; 1995 Jul; 13(4):639-41. PubMed ID: 7674081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic compression plate fixation: a biomechanical comparison of unicortical vs bicortical distal screw fixation.
Davenport SR; Lindsey RW; Leggon R; Miclau T; Panjabi M
J Orthop Trauma; 1988; 2(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 3230499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of proximal femoral grafts in canine hip arthroplasty.
Heiner JP; Kohles SS; Manley PA; Vanderby R; Markel MD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Aug; (341):233-40. PubMed ID: 9269179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A biomechanical study on different fixation of cortical bone plate allograft].
Zhang R; Liao Y; Li B
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 21(8):793-6. PubMed ID: 17882869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of cortical strain after cemented and press-fit proximal and distal femoral replacement.
Hua J; Walker PS
J Orthop Res; 1992 Sep; 10(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 1500986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cyclic loading of periprosthetic fracture fixation constructs.
Talbot M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
J Trauma; 2008 May; 64(5):1308-12. PubMed ID: 18469655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical characteristics of the bone-graft-cement interface after impaction allografting.
Frei H; Mitchell P; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
J Orthop Res; 2005 Jan; 23(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15607869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extracorporeally irradiated autograft-prosthetic composite arthroplasty using AML extensively porous-coated stem for proximal femur reconstruction: a clinical analysis of 14 patients.
Chen CF; Chen WM; Cheng YC; Chiang CC; Huang CK; Chen TH
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 100(5):418-22. PubMed ID: 19653257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate radial shaft fixation: unicortical locking fixation versus mixed bicortical and unicortical fixation in a sawbone model.
Roberts JW; Grindel SI; Rebholz B; Wang M
J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 32(7):971-5. PubMed ID: 17826548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of implanted femora after cemented and press-fit total hip arthroplasty in a canine model.
Markel MD; Gottsauner-Wolf F; Bogdanske JJ; Wahner HW; Chao EY
J Orthop Res; 1993 May; 11(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 8326453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems: a biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates.
Fulkerson E; Koval K; Preston CF; Iesaka K; Kummer FJ; Egol KA
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Feb; 20(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 16462560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tension band wire fixation for valgus osteotomies of the proximal femur: a biomechanical study of three configurations of fixation.
Volpon JB; Batista LC; Shimano MM; Moro CA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 18187241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Allograft-prosthesis composites after bone tumor resection at the proximal tibia.
Biau DJ; Dumaine V; Babinet A; Tomeno B; Anract P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 456():211-7. PubMed ID: 17091014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.
Krischak GD; Augat P; Beck A; Arand M; Baier B; Blakytny R; Gebhard F; Claes L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A biomechanical evaluation of press-fit stem constructs for tumor endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal femur.
Ferguson PC; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Deheshi BM; Bell RS; Wunder JS
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1373-9. PubMed ID: 21296548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
