139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7983561)
1. Superior displacement of the hip in total joint replacement: effects of prosthetic neck length, neck-stem angle, and anteversion angle on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles.
Delp SL; Komattu AV; Wixson RL
J Orthop Res; 1994 Nov; 12(6):860-70. PubMed ID: 7983561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Compensating for changes in muscle length in total hip arthroplasty. Effects on the moment generating capacity of the muscles.
Vasavada AN; Delp SL; Maloney WJ; Schurman DJ; Zajac FE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 May; (302):121-33. PubMed ID: 8168289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trochanteric transfer in total hip replacement: effects on the moment arms and force-generating capacities of the hip abductors.
Free SA; Delp SL
J Orthop Res; 1996 Mar; 14(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 8648502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of hip center location on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles.
Delp SL; Maloney W
J Biomech; 1993; 26(4-5):485-99. PubMed ID: 8478351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Force- and moment-generating capacity of lower-extremity muscles before and after tendon lengthening.
Delp SL; Zajac FE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Nov; (284):247-59. PubMed ID: 1395302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On hip and lumbar biomechanics. A study of joint load and muscular activity.
Németh G
Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl; 1984; 10():1-35. PubMed ID: 6390670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How superior placement of the joint center in hip arthroplasty affects the abductor muscles.
Delp SL; Wixson RL; Komattu AV; Kocmond JH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Jul; (328):137-46. PubMed ID: 8653946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.
Seki M; Yuasa N; Ohkuni K
J Orthop Res; 1998 Jul; 16(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 9747795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
Widmer KH; Majewski M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Moment arm and force-generating capacity of the extensor carpi ulnaris after transfer to the extensor carpi radialis brevis.
Herrmann AM; Delp SL
J Hand Surg Am; 1999 Sep; 24(5):1083-90. PubMed ID: 10509289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait.
Lenaerts G; Bartels W; Gelaude F; Mulier M; Spaepen A; Van der Perre G; Jonkers I
J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1246-51. PubMed ID: 19464012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of stimulated hip extension moment and position on upper-limb support forces during FNS-induced standing--a technical note.
Triolo R; Wibowo M; Uhlir J; Kobetic R; Kirsch R
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(5):545-55. PubMed ID: 11732832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement. The effects of head and neck geometry.
Chandler DR; Glousman R; Hull D; McGuire PJ; Kim IS; Clarke IC; Sarmiento A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Jun; (166):284-91. PubMed ID: 7083681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conus hip prosthesis.
Wagner H; Wagner M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mechanical effects of femoral anteversion of the hip. Assessment of the validity of Pauwels' theory (author's transl)].
Frain P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1981; 67(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 6453391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical investigation of ambulatory training in patients with acetabular dysplasia.
Kanai A; Kiyama T; Genda E; Suzuki Y
Gait Posture; 2008 Jul; 28(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18037294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subject-specific hip geometry affects predicted hip joint contact forces during gait.
Lenaerts G; De Groote F; Demeulenaere B; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Spaepen A; Jonkers I
J Biomech; 2008; 41(6):1243-52. PubMed ID: 18346745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of muscle-tendon length on joint moment and power during sprint starts.
Mero A; Kuitunen S; Harland M; Kyröläinen H; Komi PV
J Sports Sci; 2006 Feb; 24(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 16368626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone.
Yoshimine F
J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15519347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
