BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7984708)

  • 1. Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.
    Pearce JM
    Psychol Rev; 1994 Oct; 101(4):587-607. PubMed ID: 7984708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning.
    Brandon SE; Vogel EH; Wagner AR
    Behav Brain Res; 2000 Jun; 110(1-2):67-72. PubMed ID: 10802304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Summation in causal learning: elemental processing or configural generalization?
    Collins DJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1524-34. PubMed ID: 16873106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus similarity affects patterning discrimination learning.
    George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):128-148. PubMed ID: 29683694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SSCC TD: a serial and simultaneous configural-cue compound stimuli representation for temporal difference learning.
    Mondragón E; Gray J; Alonso E; Bonardi C; Jennings DJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102469. PubMed ID: 25054799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multimodal discrimination learning in humans: evidence for configural theory.
    Redhead ES
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1477-95. PubMed ID: 17853209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning.
    Pearce JM
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 May; 30(2):73-95. PubMed ID: 12141138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of similarity and experience on discrimination learning: a nonassociative connectionist model of perceptual learning.
    Saksida LM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jul; 25(3):308-23. PubMed ID: 10423855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contextual modulation of stimulus generalization in rats.
    Close J; Hahn U; Honey RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 19839703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination.
    McLaren IP; Mackintosh NJ
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Aug; 30(3):177-200. PubMed ID: 12391785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning.
    Harris JA
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):584-605. PubMed ID: 16802882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Outcome Probability on Generalization in Predictive Learning.
    Ram H; Struyf D; Vervliet B; Menahem G; Liberman N
    Exp Psychol; 2019 Jan; 66(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 30777514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recency effects as a window to generalization: separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning.
    Jones M; Love BC; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):316-32. PubMed ID: 16569149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transfer of configural learning between the components of a preexposed stimulus compound: implications for elemental and configural models of learning.
    Allman MJ; Honey RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 16834497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The representation of stimulus conjunction in theories of associative learning: A context-dependent added-elements model.
    George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):185-204. PubMed ID: 32730078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention.
    Lachnit H; Schultheis H; König S; Ungör M; Melchers K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 18426312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
    Byrom NC; Murphy RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetry in the discrimination of quantity: The role of stimulus generalization.
    Inman RA; Honey RC; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):309-21. PubMed ID: 26121275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.
    Kruschke JK
    Psychol Rev; 1992 Jan; 99(1):22-44. PubMed ID: 1546117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Convergent results in eyeblink conditioning and contingency learning in humans: addition of a common cue does not affect feature-negative discriminations.
    Thorwart A; Glautier S; Lachnit H
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20638441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.