These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7984716)

  • 1. On the relationship of the five-factor personality model to personality disorders: four reservations.
    Coolidge FL; Becker LA; DiRito DC; Durham RL; Kinlaw MM; Philbrick PB
    Psychol Rep; 1994 Aug; 75(1 Pt 1):11-21. PubMed ID: 7984716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional personality traits and the prediction of DSM-IV personality disorder symptom counts in a nonclinical sample.
    Bagby RM; Marshall MB; Georgiades S
    J Pers Disord; 2005 Feb; 19(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 15899720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structure of personality disorders from the perspective of the Revised Neo Personality Inventory domain scales and the Psychopathology-5 Scales.
    Byravan A; Ramanaiah NV
    Psychol Rep; 1999 Dec; 85(3 Pt 2):1119-22. PubMed ID: 10710968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.
    Decuyper M; De Fruyt F; Buschman J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 18790537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The validity of the five-factor model prototypes for personality disorders in two clinical samples.
    Miller JD; Reynolds SK; Pilkonis PA
    Psychol Assess; 2004 Sep; 16(3):310-22. PubMed ID: 15456386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.
    Maples JL; Guan L; Carter NT; Miller JD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1070-84. PubMed ID: 24932643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revised NEO Personality Inventory profiles of narcissistic and nonnarcissistic people.
    Ramanaiah NV; Detwiler FR; Byravan A
    Psychol Rep; 1994 Aug; 75(1 Pt 2):512-4. PubMed ID: 7809326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The five-factor model and its assessment in clinical settings.
    McCrae RR
    J Pers Assess; 1991 Dec; 57(3):399-14. PubMed ID: 1757868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correspondence between students' scores on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II and Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised.
    Wierzbicki M; Gorman JL
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Dec; 77(3 Pt 2):1079-82. PubMed ID: 8643770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Personality assessment with the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory: the 30-Item-Short-Version (NEO-FFI-30)].
    Körner A; Geyer M; Roth M; Drapeau M; Schmutzer G; Albani C; Schumann S; Brähler E
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 2008 Jun; 58(6):238-45. PubMed ID: 17899495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure of the Coolidge Axis II Inventory Personality Disorder Scales from the five-factor model perspective.
    Ramanaiah NV; Sharpi JP
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):947-52. PubMed ID: 9923173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between the basic personality inventory and the NEO-Personality Inventory in a nonpatient sample.
    Levin J; Montag I
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Dec; 69(3 Pt 2):1176-8. PubMed ID: 1792287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The MCMI-III personality disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: a comparative study.
    Aluja A; García LF; Cuevas L; García O
    J Pers Disord; 2007 Feb; 21(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 17373890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults.
    Fossati A; Krueger RF; Markon KE; Borroni S; Maffei C
    Assessment; 2013 Dec; 20(6):689-708. PubMed ID: 24065702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of maladaptive variants of Five-Factor Model traits.
    Lynam DR
    J Pers; 2012 Dec; 80(6):1593-614. PubMed ID: 22321444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire and DSM-III-R personality traits.
    Goldman RG; Skodol AE; McGrath PJ; Oldham JM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1994 Feb; 151(2):274-6. PubMed ID: 8296904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and validity of the Coolidge Axis II Inventory: a new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders.
    Coolidge FL; Merwin MM
    J Pers Assess; 1992 Oct; 59(2):223-38. PubMed ID: 1432558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The validity of Cloninger's psychobiological model versus the five-factor model to predict DSM-IV personality disorders in a heterogeneous psychiatric sample: domain facet and residualized facet descriptions.
    De Fruyt F; De Clercq BJ; van de Wiele L; Van Heeringen K
    J Pers; 2006 Apr; 74(2):479-510. PubMed ID: 16529584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the big-five factor structure across samples of Chinese and American adults.
    Trull TJ; Geary DC
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Oct; 69(2):324-41. PubMed ID: 9392894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinician's judgments of the utility of the DSM-IV and five-factor models for personality disordered patients.
    Mullins-Sweatt SN; Widiger TA
    J Pers Disord; 2011 Aug; 25(4):463-77. PubMed ID: 21838562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.