These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7984992)

  • 1. [Amalgam as the measure in filling therapy. A determination of its place].
    Barbakow F; Ackermann M; Krejci I; Lutz F
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(11):1341-50. PubMed ID: 7984992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Success rates of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in permanent teeth in high caries-risk Filipino children.
    Schüler IM; Monse B; Holmgren CJ; Lehmann T; Itchon GS; Heinrich-Weltzien R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1493-500. PubMed ID: 25483123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reasons for replacement of amalgam dental restorations.
    Dahl JE; Eriksen HM
    Scand J Dent Res; 1978 Sep; 86(5):404-7. PubMed ID: 281762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Amalgam. V. A durable restoration material?].
    Penning C
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 May; 100(5):225-8. PubMed ID: 11822151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replacement of amalgam restorations that have marginal defects: variation and cost implications.
    Maryniuk GA
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Apr; 21(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 2243932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of staining and marginal ditching as criteria for diagnosis of secondary caries around occlusal amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Magalhães CS; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Ferreira EF
    Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20069254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Problems and benefits associated with restorative materials: side-effects and long-term cost.
    Mjör IA
    Adv Dent Res; 1992 Sep; 6():7-16. PubMed ID: 1292466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Replacement and initial placement of tooth colored restorations: a review and discussion.
    Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1998 Jan; 78(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9800555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical assessments of dental amalgam restorations.
    Mahler DB; Marantz RL
    Int Dent J; 1980 Dec; 30(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 6935163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the quality of proximal restorations with plastic materials: radiographic study].
    Karimi Z; Kessa S; Chala S; Abdallaoui F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Sep; 38(151):5-12. PubMed ID: 26930769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of bonded and non-bonded amalgam restorations in general dental practice.
    Worskett P
    Br Dent J; 2013 Apr; 214(7):E19. PubMed ID: 23579163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.