These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Three courts examine entity liability for conduct of physicians. Hosp Law Newsl; 2003 Jun; 20(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 12822279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicolegal sidebar: Physician competence and skill part II: Hospital corporate responsibility and new technologies. Bal BS; Brenner LH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jul; 472(7):2023-7. PubMed ID: 24807348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When ignorance isn't bliss: what healthcare practitioners and facilities should know about complementary and alternative medicine. Vincler LA; Nicol MF J Health Hosp Law; 1997; 30(3):160-78. PubMed ID: 10179113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent and battery claims in AIDS transfusion cases. Kurland R Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 7(12):7-12. PubMed ID: 10123072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical battery and failure to obtain informed consent: Illinois court decision suggests potential for IRB liability. LeBlang TR IRB; 1995; 17(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 11654268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. PA: no liability for informed consent: "prudent nurse" explanation standard applies. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Nov; 38(6):3. PubMed ID: 9444231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The standard of disclosure in human subject experimentation. Morin K J Leg Med; 1998 Jun; 19(2):157-221. PubMed ID: 9658739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical malpractice, informed consent and human experimentation in Western Europe. Deutsch E Int J Med Law; 1979; 1(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 11662749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research. Noah BA J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court tells jury to ignore human subject protection regulations. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Mar; 10(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Court finds basis for hospital liability on informed consent theory. Friter v. Iolab Corp. Hershey N Hosp Law Newsl; 1993 Nov; 11(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 10183976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal briefing: informed consent in the clinical context. Pope TM; Hexum M J Clin Ethics; 2014; 25(2):152-75. PubMed ID: 24972066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shock therapy and psychiatric malpractice; the legal accomodation to a controversial treatment. Krouner LW J Forensic Sci Soc; 1973; 2():397-439. PubMed ID: 11664244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent when using medical devices for indications not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Smith JJ; Berlin L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):879-82. PubMed ID: 10511140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The law's 3 standards of informed consent. Dunn LJ Manag Care; 1994 Nov; 3(11):29-30. PubMed ID: 10141787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Austrian cases on medical liability. Koch BA Eur J Health Law; 2003 Jun; 10(2):91-114. PubMed ID: 14635455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pioneer interventions in surgery and their legal background]. Deutsch E Zentralbl Chir; 1992; 117(10):569-74. PubMed ID: 1441783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Guinea pigs in the ER: researchers debate the ethics and logistics of performing emergency research without patients' consent. Guterman L Chron High Educ; 2006 Jun; 52(41):A14-8. PubMed ID: 16856301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]