These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7986141)

  • 1. Of mice and men. Honesty and integrity in medicine.
    Ariyan S
    Ann Surg; 1994 Dec; 220(6):745-50. PubMed ID: 7986141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is misconduct in science?
    Schachman HK
    Science; 1993 Jul; 261(5118):148-9, 183. PubMed ID: 8305005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misconduct and the development of ethics in the biological sciences.
    Reiser SJ
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 7858748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
    Price AR
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The definition of misconduct in science: a view from NSF.
    Buzzelli DE
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):584-5, 647-8. PubMed ID: 8430300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting.
    Anekwe TD
    Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):267-72. PubMed ID: 19222448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Institutional and individual responsibilities for integrity in research.
    Steneck NH
    Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):51-3. PubMed ID: 12762926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Cantekin affair.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3333-7. PubMed ID: 1960835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Misconduct in science: should its definition include mischievous or improper allegations?
    Burgman MA
    Q Rev Biol; 1994 Jun; 69(2):233-5. PubMed ID: 8066177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Global trend: more science, more fraud.
    Altman L; Broad WJ
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():F1, F6. PubMed ID: 16450465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pitching doctors.
    Wilkes MS; Shuchman M
    N Y Times Mag; 1989 Nov; ():88, 90, 126, 128-129. PubMed ID: 11650264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The end of the Baltimore saga.
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6322):85. PubMed ID: 2030733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific misconduct in medical research.
    Verma BL; Shukla GD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 90(8):222-5. PubMed ID: 1460306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mistakes and fraud in medical research.
    Friedman PJ
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(1-2):17-25. PubMed ID: 1630139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and scientific misconduct: preventive and correction action.
    Wiwanitkit S; Wiwanitkit V
    Vaccine; 2013 Apr; 31(14):1765. PubMed ID: 23328314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accountability, audit, and reverence for the publication process.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1993 Jul; 270(4):495-6. PubMed ID: 8320791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?
    Berg AO
    Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2182360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Author misconduct: editors as educators of research integrity.
    Marusić A
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 15612894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.