These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7986493)

  • 21. Less attention and more perception in cued line bisection.
    Fischer MH
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 8043264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rightward bisection errors for letter lines: the role of semantic information.
    Mohr C; Leonards U
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 16945395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visuospatial neglect in near and far space: dissociation between line bisection and letter cancellation.
    Keller I; Schindler I; Kerkhoff G; von Rosen F; Golz D
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):724-31. PubMed ID: 15721185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Cortex; 2000 Dec; 36(5):715-31. PubMed ID: 11195917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of local and global processing demands on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Oct; 59(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 16019116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial emotional akinesia in Parkinson disease.
    Drago V; Foster PS; Skidmore F; Trifiletti D; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Jun; 21(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 18541985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patterns of line bisection in patients suffering from unilateral spatial neglect.
    Carlomagno S; Parlato V; Belfiore A; Silvano A; Vanderlinden M; Seron X
    Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1993 Aug; 15(4):241-52. PubMed ID: 8249667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Understanding the effects of moving visual stimuli on unilateral neglect following stroke.
    Plummer P; Dunai J; Morris ME
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Mar; 60(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 16466838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared.
    Kraft A; Pape N; Hagendorf H; Schmidt S; Naito A; Brandt SA
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1133(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 17174284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of center of mass effect on the distribution of spatial attention in the vertical and horizontal dimensions.
    Shuren JE; Jacobs DH; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 9220092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peripersonal spatial attention in children with spina bifida: associations between horizontal and vertical line bisection and congenital malformations of the corpus callosum, midbrain, and posterior cortex.
    Dennis M; Edelstein K; Frederick J; Copeland K; Francis D; Blaser SE; Kramer LA; Drake JM; Brandt M; Hetherington R; Fletcher JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2000-10. PubMed ID: 15893777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early visual selection in near and far space: an event-related potential study.
    Kasai T
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jun; 19(9):961-4. PubMed ID: 18521001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lateralized irrelevant speech alters visuospatial selective attention mechanisms.
    Schaefer M; Tewes U; Münte TF; Johannes S
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16188366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is the origin of the hemianopic line bisection error purely visual? Evidence from eye movements in simulated hemianopia.
    Schuett S; Kentridge RW; Zihl J; Heywood CA
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(13):1668-80. PubMed ID: 19362571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial attention and the mental number line: evidence for characteristic biases and compression.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1400-7. PubMed ID: 17157335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Slater J
    Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D58-71. PubMed ID: 10702377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of allocation of visuo-spatial attention to visual stimuli triggering unilateral arm abduction on anticipatory postural control.
    Tomita H; Fujiwara K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):2086-97. PubMed ID: 18620907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.