BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7986648)

  • 1. Transmission electron microscopy of GroEL, GroES, and the symmetrical GroEL/ES complex.
    Harris JR; Plückthun A; Zahn R
    J Struct Biol; 1994; 112(3):216-30. PubMed ID: 7986648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nucleotide-dependent complex formation between the Escherichia coli chaperonins GroEL and GroES studied under equilibrium conditions.
    Behlke J; Ristau O; Schönfeld HJ
    Biochemistry; 1997 Apr; 36(17):5149-56. PubMed ID: 9136876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional significance of symmetrical versus asymmetrical GroEL-GroES chaperonin complexes.
    Engel A; Hayer-Hartl MK; Goldie KN; Pfeifer G; Hegerl R; Müller S; da Silva AC; Baumeister W; Hartl FU
    Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5225):832-6. PubMed ID: 7638600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electron microscopy of Bacillus subtilis GroESL chaperonin and interaction with the bacteriophage phi 29 head-tail connector.
    Tsuprun V; Rajagopal BS; Anderson D
    J Struct Biol; 1995; 115(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 8573469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Co-expression of chaperonin GroEL/GroES enhances in vivo folding of yeast mitochondrial aconitase and alters the growth characteristics of Escherichia coli.
    Gupta P; Aggarwal N; Batra P; Mishra S; Chaudhuri TK
    Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2006; 38(11):1975-85. PubMed ID: 16822698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chaperonins GroEL and GroES: views from atomic force microscopy.
    Mou J; Sheng S; Ho R; Shao Z
    Biophys J; 1996 Oct; 71(4):2213-21. PubMed ID: 8889197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allostery wiring diagrams in the transitions that drive the GroEL reaction cycle.
    Tehver R; Chen J; Thirumalai D
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 387(2):390-406. PubMed ID: 19121324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterisation of mutations in GroES that allow GroEL to function as a single ring.
    Liu H; Kovács E; Lund PA
    FEBS Lett; 2009 Jul; 583(14):2365-71. PubMed ID: 19545569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From minichaperone to GroEL 3: properties of an active single-ring mutant of GroEL.
    Chatellier J; Hill F; Foster NW; Goloubinoff P; Fersht AR
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Dec; 304(5):897-910. PubMed ID: 11124035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Folding with and without encapsulation by cis- and trans-only GroEL-GroES complexes.
    Farr GW; Fenton WA; Chaudhuri TK; Clare DK; Saibil HR; Horwich AL
    EMBO J; 2003 Jul; 22(13):3220-30. PubMed ID: 12839985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings.
    Kad NM; Ranson NA; Cliff MJ; Clarke AR
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Apr; 278(1):267-78. PubMed ID: 9571049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Ligand-Induced Reassembly of GroEL/ES Chaperone In Vitro: Visualization by Electron Microscopy].
    Ryabova NA; Selivanova OM; Semisotnov GV
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2018; 52(1):120-124. PubMed ID: 29512644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The mechanism of GroEL/GroES folding/refolding of protein substrates revisited.
    Jones H; Preuss M; Wright M; Miller AD
    Org Biomol Chem; 2006 Apr; 4(7):1223-35. PubMed ID: 16557310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity.
    Shimamura T; Koike-Takeshita A; Yokoyama K; Masui R; Murai N; Yoshida M; Taguchi H; Iwata S
    Structure; 2004 Aug; 12(8):1471-80. PubMed ID: 15296740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reversible oligomerization and denaturation of the chaperonin GroES.
    Seale JW; Gorovits BM; Ybarra J; Horowitz PM
    Biochemistry; 1996 Apr; 35(13):4079-83. PubMed ID: 8672442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crystal structure of a symmetric football-shaped GroEL:GroES2-ATP14 complex determined at 3.8Å reveals rearrangement between two GroEL rings.
    Koike-Takeshita A; Arakawa T; Taguchi H; Shimamura T
    J Mol Biol; 2014 Oct; 426(21):3634-41. PubMed ID: 25174333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of chaperonins in protein folding. A new model of the GroEL/GroES complex architecture.
    Basharov MA
    Biochemistry (Mosc); 1997 Apr; 62(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 9312423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The formation of symmetrical GroEL-GroES complexes in the presence of ATP.
    Llorca O; Marco S; Carrascosa JL; Valpuesta JM
    FEBS Lett; 1994 May; 345(2-3):181-6. PubMed ID: 7911087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phosphofructokinase interacts with molecular chaperonins GroEL and GroES.
    Melegh B; Minami Y
    Acta Biol Hung; 1997; 48(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 9847453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the role of symmetrical and asymmetrical chaperonin complexes in assisted protein folding.
    Hayer-Hartl MK; Ewalt KL; Hartl FU
    Biol Chem; 1999 May; 380(5):531-40. PubMed ID: 10384959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.