These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7986792)

  • 1. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records.
    Bingham SA; Gill C; Welch A; Day K; Cassidy A; Khaw KT; Sneyd MJ; Key TJ; Roe L; Day NE
    Br J Nutr; 1994 Oct; 72(4):619-43. PubMed ID: 7986792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of food consumption and nutrient intake assessed with three dietary assessment methods: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II.
    Straßburg A; Eisinger-Watzl M; Krems C; Roth A; Hoffmann I
    Eur J Nutr; 2019 Feb; 58(1):193-210. PubMed ID: 29189903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overestimation of infant and toddler energy intake by 24-h recall compared with weighed food records.
    Fisher JO; Butte NF; Mendoza PM; Wilson TA; Hodges EA; Reidy KC; Deming D
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2008 Aug; 88(2):407-15. PubMed ID: 18689377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers.
    Bingham SA; Gill C; Welch A; Cassidy A; Runswick SA; Oakes S; Lubin R; Thurnham DI; Key TJ; Roe L; Khaw KT; Day NE
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997; 26 Suppl 1():S137-51. PubMed ID: 9126542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a three-day estimated food record, a 72-hour recall and a food-frequency questionnaire for dietary assessment in a Mediterranean Spanish population.
    Schröder H; Covas MI; Marrugat J; Vila J; Pena A; Alcántara M; Masiá R
    Clin Nutr; 2001 Oct; 20(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 11534938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers.
    Bingham SA; Cassidy A; Cole TJ; Welch A; Runswick SA; Black AE; Thurnham D; Bates C; Khaw KT; Key TJ
    Br J Nutr; 1995 Apr; 73(4):531-50. PubMed ID: 7794870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using biochemical markers to assess the validity of prospective dietary assessment methods and the effect of energy adjustment.
    Bingham SA; Day NE
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Apr; 65(4 Suppl):1130S-1137S. PubMed ID: 9094909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation study on a new method of dietary assessment with instant photography applied in urban pregnant women in Nanjing city].
    Jiang T; Dai Y; Miao M; Zhang Y; Song C; Wang Z
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Jul; 44(4):586-92. PubMed ID: 26454956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relative validity of the repeated 24 h recall for estimating energy and selected nutrient intakes of rural Ghanaian children.
    Ferguson EL; Gibson RS; Opare-Obisaw C
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Apr; 48(4):241-52. PubMed ID: 8039484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Development, Validation, and User Evaluation of Foodbook24: A Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool Developed for the Irish Adult Population.
    Timon CM; Blain RJ; McNulty B; Kehoe L; Evans K; Walton J; Flynn A; Gibney ER
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 May; 19(5):e158. PubMed ID: 28495662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a new instrument for evaluating individuals' dietary intakes.
    Wang DH; Kogashiwa M; Kira S
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Oct; 106(10):1588-93. PubMed ID: 17000191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons of four dietary assessment methods during pregnancy in Taiwanese women.
    Lyu LC; Hsu YN; Chen HF; Lo CC; Lin CL
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 53(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25017260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating energy intake of urban women in Colombia: comparison of diet records and recalls.
    Dufour DL; Staten LK; Waslien CI; Reina JC; Spurr GB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1999 Jan; 108(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 9915301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of a commercial smartphone application for dietary assessment in epidemiological research and comparison with 24-h dietary recalls.
    Ambrosini GL; Hurworth M; Giglia R; Trapp G; Strauss P
    Nutr J; 2018 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 29316930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Food photography II: use of food photographs for estimating portion size and the nutrient content of meals.
    Nelson M; Atkinson M; Darbyshire S
    Br J Nutr; 1996 Jul; 76(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 8774215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection of methodology to assess food intake.
    Biró G; Hulshof KF; Ovesen L; Amorim Cruz JA;
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2002 May; 56 Suppl 2():S25-32. PubMed ID: 12082515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A rapid self-administered food frequency questionnaire for the evaluation of dietary protein intake.
    Morin P; Herrmann F; Ammann P; Uebelhart B; Rizzoli R
    Clin Nutr; 2005 Oct; 24(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 15908055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Malmö Food Study: validity of two dietary assessment methods for measuring nutrient intake.
    Riboli E; Elmståhl S; Saracci R; Gullberg B; Lindgärde F
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997; 26 Suppl 1():S161-73. PubMed ID: 9126544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of weighed food record procedures for the reference methods in two validation studies of food frequency questionnaires.
    Ishii Y; Ishihara J; Takachi R; Shinozawa Y; Imaeda N; Goto C; Wakai K; Takahashi T; Iso H; Nakamura K; Tanaka J; Shimazu T; Yamaji T; Sasazuki S; Sawada N; Iwasaki M; Mikami H; Kuriki K; Naito M; Okamoto N; Kondo F; Hosono S; Miyagawa N; Ozaki E; Katsuura-Kamano S; Ohnaka K; Nanri H; Tsunematsu-Nakahata N; Kayama T; Kurihara A; Kojima S; Tanaka H; Tsugane S
    J Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):331-337. PubMed ID: 28302344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The validity of a web-based FFQ assessed by doubly labelled water and multiple 24-h recalls.
    Medin AC; Carlsen MH; Hambly C; Speakman JR; Strohmaier S; Andersen LF
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Dec; 118(12):1106-1117. PubMed ID: 29202890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.