199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7987084)
1. [Knife conization versus loop excision--clinical and histomorphologic results].
Girardi F; Heydarfadai M; Koroschetz F; Pickel H; Winter R
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(3):162-4. PubMed ID: 7987084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cold-knife conization versus loop excision: histopathologic and clinical results of a randomized trial.
Girardi F; Heydarfadai M; Koroschetz F; Pickel H; Winter R
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Dec; 55(3 Pt 1):368-70. PubMed ID: 7835776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cold knife conization and loop excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Takac I; Gorisek B
Tumori; 1999; 85(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 10587025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Radiosurgical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Reinthaller A; Kainz C; Tempfer G; Joura E
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 7950445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision.
Giacalone PL; Laffargue F; Aligier N; Roger P; Combecal J; Daures JP
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 10600289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of chronic cervicitis: the loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Hakverdi AU; Gül T; Taner CE; Vural A; Erden AC; Yilmaztürk A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 9050198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
Fanning J; Padratzik J
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. C-LETZ versus large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial.
Boonlikit S; Thitisagulwong S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1173-9. PubMed ID: 22710953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy.
Oyesanya OA; Amerasinghe C; Manning EA
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 8349168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure, conization and hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Murta EF; Silva AO; Silva EA
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 16550969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins.
Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Electrosurgical loop excision as diagnostic and simultaneously therapeutic intervention in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Deppe G; Baumann P; Malviya VK; Malone JM; Christensen CW
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1993; 105(24):715-8. PubMed ID: 8116308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conization by harmonic scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a clinicopathological study.
Akahira J; Konno R; Moriya T; Yamakawa H; Igarashi T; Ito K; Sato S; Yajima A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 50(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 11093051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
