These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7987380)

  • 1. The frontal plane relationship of the forefoot to the rearfoot in an asymptomatic population.
    Garbalosa JC; McClure MH; Catlin PA; Wooden M
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 Oct; 20(4):200-6. PubMed ID: 7987380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of subtalar joint position on dorsiflexion of the ankle/rearfoot versus midfoot/forefoot during gastrocnemius stretching.
    Johanson MA; DeArment A; Hines K; Riley E; Martin M; Thomas J; Geist K
    Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Jan; 35(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 24259750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between forefoot, midfoot, and rearfoot static alignment in pain-free individuals.
    Buchanan KR; Davis I
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2005 Sep; 35(9):559-66. PubMed ID: 16268242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in foot and shank coupling due to alterations in foot strike pattern during running.
    Pohl MB; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Mar; 23(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 18006125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in foot and lower limb coupling due to systematic variations in step width.
    Pohl MB; Messenger N; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Feb; 21(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 16269207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between forefoot and rearfoot static alignment in pain-free individuals with above-average forefoot varus angles.
    Johanson MA; Greenfeld L; Hung C; Walters R; Watson C
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2010 Jun; 3(3):112-6. PubMed ID: 20508010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking.
    Monaghan GM; Lewis CL; Hsu WH; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    Gait Posture; 2013 May; 38(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23117096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forefoot varus predicts subtalar hyperpronation in young people.
    Silva RS; Ferreira AL; Veronese LM; Serrão FV
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Nov; 104(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 25514271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of first ray dorsal mobility among different forefoot alignments.
    Glasoe WM; Allen MK; Ludewig PM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2000 Oct; 30(10):612-20; discussion 621-3. PubMed ID: 11041198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of foot kinematics between subjects with posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction and healthy controls.
    Tome J; Nawoczenski DA; Flemister A; Houck J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2006 Sep; 36(9):635-44. PubMed ID: 17017268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alignment and joint motion in the normal foot.
    Aström M; Arvidson T
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1995 Nov; 22(5):216-22. PubMed ID: 8580949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying rearfoot-forefoot coordination in human walking.
    Chang R; Van Emmerik R; Hamill J
    J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):3101-5. PubMed ID: 18778823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of rocker sole and SACH heel on kinematics in gait.
    Wu WL; Rosenbaum D; Su FC
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Oct; 26(8):639-46. PubMed ID: 15471691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between static and dynamic foot postures in professional baseball players.
    Donatelli R; Wooden M; Ekedahl SR; Wilkes JS; Cooper J; Bush AJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1999 Jun; 29(6):316-25; discussion 326-30. PubMed ID: 10370915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can the Foot Posture Index or their individual criteria predict dynamic plantar pressures?
    Sánchez-Rodríguez R; Martínez-Nova A; Escamilla-Martínez E; Pedrera-Zamorano JD
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jul; 36(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 22727718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of ankle-foot orthoses on ankle and foot kinematics in patients with subtalar osteoarthritis.
    Huang YC; Harbst K; Kotajarvi B; Hansen D; Koff MF; Kitaoka HB; Kaufman KR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Aug; 87(8):1131-6. PubMed ID: 16876560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forefoot supinatus.
    Evans EL; Catanzariti AR
    Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 2014 Jul; 31(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 24980930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait.
    Pohl MB; Messenger N; Buckley JG
    Gait Posture; 2007 Feb; 25(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 16759862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship of foot deformity to ulcer location in patients with diabetes mellitus.
    Mueller MJ; Minor SD; Diamond JE; Blair VP
    Phys Ther; 1990 Jun; 70(6):356-62. PubMed ID: 2345779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.