These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7987428)

  • 1. Improvements in estimating the harmonics-to-noise ratio of the voice.
    Awan SN; Frenkel ML
    J Voice; 1994 Sep; 8(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 7987428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral noise estimation in the evaluation of pathological voice.
    Murphy PJ
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 17114131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
    Watts CR; Awan SN; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):387.e1-387.e10. PubMed ID: 27751661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A structured approach to voice range profile (phonetogram) analysis.
    Sulter AM; Wit HP; Schutte HK; Miller DG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Oct; 37(5):1076-85. PubMed ID: 7823554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technical considerations in computation of spectral harmonics-to-noise ratios for sustained vowels.
    Cox NB; Ito MR; Morrison MD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):203-18. PubMed ID: 2704196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Hoarseness].
    Klingholz F
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Jul; 67(7):346-9. PubMed ID: 3210866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer-considering signal type and smoothed cepstral peak prominence.
    Stone D; McCabe P; Palme CE; Heard R; Eastwood C; Riffat F; Madill C
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 25301299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal and spectral estimations of harmonics-to-noise ratio in human voice signals.
    Qi Y; Hillman RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jul; 102(1):537-43. PubMed ID: 9228816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Regulation of voice quality parameters at the beginning of phonation].
    Lamprecht A
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1990; 42(6):302-11. PubMed ID: 2081582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cepstrum analysis in voice disorders].
    Zieger K; Schneider C; Gerull G; Mrowinski D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1995; 47(4):210-7. PubMed ID: 7670554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pathological likelihood index as a measurement of the degree of voice normality and perceived hoarseness.
    Godino-Llorente JI; Gómez-Vilda P; Cruz-Roldán F; Blanco-Velasco M; Fraile R
    J Voice; 2010 Nov; 24(6):667-77. PubMed ID: 20207107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Spectrographic study of voice disorders: subharmonics].
    Núñez Batalla F; Suárez Nieto C; Muñoz Pinto C; Baragaño Río L; Alvarez Zapico MJ; Martínez Ferreras A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2000; 51(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10799933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
    Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A computer system for acoustic analysis of pathological voices and laryngeal diseases screening.
    Hadjitodorov S; Mitev P
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 12135650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of the glottal to noise excitation ratio for the screening of voice disorders.
    Godino-Llorente JI; Osma-Ruiz V; Sáenz-Lechón N; Gómez-Vilda P; Blanco-Velasco M; Cruz-Roldán F
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 19135854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic Evaluation of Voice Quality Using Text-Based Laryngograph Measurements and Prosodic Analysis.
    Haderlein T; Schwemmle C; Döllinger M; Matoušek V; Ptok M; Nöth E
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():316325. PubMed ID: 26136813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic analyses of thyroidectomy-related changes in vowel phonation.
    Solomon NP; Awan SN; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 23177742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Harmonics-to-noise ratio as an index of the degree of hoarseness.
    Yumoto E; Gould WJ; Baer T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jun; 71(6):1544-9. PubMed ID: 7108029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital analysis of the acoustic signal in vocal pathology diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity of shimmer and jitter measurements].
    Preciado JA; Fernández S
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1998; 49(6):475-81. PubMed ID: 9830224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The harmonic-to-noise ratio applied to dog barks.
    Riede T; Herzel H; Hammerschmidt K; Brunnberg L; Tembrock G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2191-7. PubMed ID: 11681395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.