These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Consent to treatment: loophole in the Ontario Mental Health Act. Jaychuk G; Manchanda R; Galbraith DA Can J Psychiatry; 1991 Oct; 36(8):594-6. PubMed ID: 1742714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Coerced treatment according to the right to treatment regulation: never contrary to the will of mentally competent patients]. Weber M Pflege Z; 2007 Apr; 60(4):222-4. PubMed ID: 17494432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consent and the mentally disordered detained patient. Dimond B Br J Nurs; 2003 Dec 11-2004 Jan 7; 12(22):1331-4. PubMed ID: 14688654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic? Mossman D Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The patient as "subject" and capacity to give informed consent. Kumakura N Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol; 1994; 48 Suppl():45-51. PubMed ID: 7799542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of mental capacity: a dilemma. Paul M Br J Psychiatry; 1996 Apr; 168(4):519. PubMed ID: 8730952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. End stage anorexia: criteria for competence to refuse treatment. Gans M; Gunn WB Int J Law Psychiatry; 2003; 26(6):677-95. PubMed ID: 14637208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons in the United States and Romania: a comparative analysis. Loue S Rev Rom Bioet; 2003; 1(1):55-88. PubMed ID: 15011669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The "therapeutic orgy" and the "right to rot" collide: the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs under state law. Blackburn CE Houst Law Rev; 1990 May; 27(3):447-513. PubMed ID: 16032811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication. Goff ML Indiana Law J; 2001; 76(4):983-1000. PubMed ID: 12455521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell. Appelbaum PS Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Consent and capacity: principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Fullbrook S Br J Nurs; 2007 Apr 12-25; 16(7):412-3. PubMed ID: 17505364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy. Latzer B Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]