138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7988585)
1. Double burst stimulation with submaximal current.
Ueda N; Masuda Y; Muteki T; Harada H; Tsuda H; Tobata H
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1994 Sep; 11(5):403-6. PubMed ID: 7988585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double burst monitoring during surgical degrees of neuromuscular blockade: a comparison with train-of-four.
Kirkegaard-Nielsen H; Helbo-Hansen HS; Lindholm P; Severinsen IK; Bülow K
Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1995; 12(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 8820324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double burst stimulation for monitoring profound neuromuscular blockade: a comparison with posttetanic count and train of four.
Kirkegaard Nielsen H; May O
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1992; 43(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 1300858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of train-of-four and double burst stimulation ratios at varying amperages.
Brull SJ; Connelly NR; Silverman DG
Anesth Analg; 1990 Nov; 71(5):489-92. PubMed ID: 2171383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of the double burst stimulation (DBS) pattern on the DBS-train-of-four ratio relationship.
Kirkegaard-Nielsen H; May O
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 May; 30(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 7605836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of train-of-four monitoring at varying stimulating currents.
Helbo-Hansen HS; Bang U; Nielsen HK; Skovgaard LT
Anesthesiology; 1992 Feb; 76(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 1736696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the diagnosis of significant residual neuromuscular blockade improved by using double-burst nerve stimulation?
Ueda N; Muteki T; Tsuda H; Inoue S; Nishina H
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1991 May; 8(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 1651857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A pharmacodynamic basis for the peak effect of vecuronium: peak twitch versus peak tetanic fade.
Tripathi M; Tripathi M
J Indian Med Assoc; 2002 Aug; 100(8):491-2, 494, 501. PubMed ID: 12675179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the double burst stimulus with the train-of-four stimuli in monitoring muscle relaxation during anesthesia].
González-Arévalo A; Pensado A; Caro MM; Jiménez J; Jouve MJ
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 1996; 43(7):235-8. PubMed ID: 8966350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of double-burst monitoring at 10 mA above threshold current.
Silverman DG; Brull SJ
Can J Anaesth; 1993 Jun; 40(6):502-6. PubMed ID: 8104723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual assessment of train-of-four and double burst-induced fade at submaximal stimulating currents.
Brull SJ; Silverman DG
Anesth Analg; 1991 Nov; 73(5):627-32. PubMed ID: 1952146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of residual neuromuscular blockade using modified double burst stimulation.
Saitoh Y; Nakazawa K; Makita K; Tanaka H; Toyooka H
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1997 Jun; 41(6):741-5. PubMed ID: 9241335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring the onset of neuromuscular blockade with double burst stimulation (DBS).
Gorgias N; Maidatsi P; Zaralidou A; Ourailoglou V; Fakidou A; Giala M
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1998 Nov; 20(9):801-4. PubMed ID: 10022034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceleromyography vs. electromyography: an ipsilateral comparison of the indirectly evoked neuromuscular response to train-of-four stimulation.
Kopman AF; Chin W; Cyriac J
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Mar; 49(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 15752395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of tetanus on subsequent neuromuscular monitoring in patients receiving vecuronium.
Brull SJ; Connelly NR; O'Connor TZ; Silverman DG
Anesthesiology; 1991 Jan; 74(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 1670914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of tactile and mechanomyographical assessment of response to double burst and train-of-four stimulation during moderate and profound neuromuscular blockade.
Kirkegaard-Nielsen H; Helbo-Hansen HS; Severinsen IK; Lindholm P; Pedersen HS; Schmidt MB
Can J Anaesth; 1995 Jan; 42(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7889580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Manual evaluation of residual curarization using double burst stimulation: a comparison with train-of-four.
Drenck NE; Ueda N; Olsen NV; Engbaek J; Jensen E; Skovgaard LT; Viby-Mogensen J
Anesthesiology; 1989 Apr; 70(4):578-81. PubMed ID: 2929994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tactile evaluation of the response to double burst stimulation decreases, but does not eliminate, the problem of postoperative residual paralysis.
Fruergaard K; Viby-Mogensen J; Berg H; el-Mahdy AM
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1998 Nov; 42(10):1168-74. PubMed ID: 9834799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Train-of-four and double burst stimulation fade at the great toe and thumb.
Saitoh Y; Koitabashi Y; Makita K; Tanaka H; Amaha K
Can J Anaesth; 1997 Apr; 44(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 9104521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Residual non-depolarising neuromuscular block assessed by train-of-four stimulation in the dog.
Cullen LK; Jones RS
Res Vet Sci; 1982 Jan; 32(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 7089375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
