156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7989051)
1. Effects of speech intelligibility level on concurrent visual task performance.
Payne DG; Peters LJ; Birkmire DP; Bonto MA; Anastasi JS; Wenger MJ
Hum Factors; 1994 Sep; 36(3):441-75. PubMed ID: 7989051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Processing of a speech signal and thereby necessary attention: a contribution to dual performance].
Lazarus-Mainka G; Arnold M; Tkocz N
Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1989; 197(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 2572093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of presentation level on memory performance.
Heinrich A; Schneider BA
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21278574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual scanning with or without spatial uncertainty and divided and selective attention.
Liu Y; Wickens CD
Acta Psychol (Amst); 1992 Mar; 79(2):131-53. PubMed ID: 1598843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.
Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Jun; 129(2):155-76. PubMed ID: 10868332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of template complexity on visual search and dual-task performance.
Bourke PA; Duncan J
Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15733201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual speech improves the intelligibility of time-expanded auditory speech.
Tanaka A; Sakamoto S; Tsumura K; Suzuki Y
Neuroreport; 2009 Mar; 20(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19240661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction.
Sarampalis A; Kalluri S; Edwards B; Hafter E
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1230-40. PubMed ID: 19380604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modality specificity and integration in working memory: Insights from visuospatial bootstrapping.
Allen RJ; Havelka J; Falcon T; Evans S; Darling S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 25329090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing speech in noise: seeing a loud talker is better.
Kim J; Sironic A; Davis C
Perception; 2011; 40(7):853-62. PubMed ID: 22128557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of visual information on the intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
Keintz CK; Bunton K; Hoit JD
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2007 Aug; 16(3):222-34. PubMed ID: 17666548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception.
Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1360-74. PubMed ID: 19633351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for performed tasks.
Engelkamp J
Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 9046874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attentional capture by spoken language: effects on netballers' visual task performance.
Bishop DT; Moore S; Horne S; Teszka R
J Sports Sci; 2014; 32(17):1611-20. PubMed ID: 24734776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gaze patterns and audiovisual speech enhancement.
Yi A; Wong W; Eizenman M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 23275394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Audio and visual cues in a two-talker divided attention speech-monitoring task.
Brungart DS; Kordik AJ; Simpson BD
Hum Factors; 2005; 47(3):562-73. PubMed ID: 16435697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interference with olfactory memory by visual and verbal tasks.
Annett JM; Cook NM; Leslie JC
Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 2):1307-17. PubMed ID: 7478892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An auditory attention task: a note on the processing of verbal information.
Linde L
Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Apr; 78(2):563-70. PubMed ID: 8022682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
