These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7989274)

  • 1. Self-presentation dynamics on overt integrity tests: experimental studies of the Reid Report.
    Cunningham MR; Wong DT; Barbee AP
    J Appl Psychol; 1994 Oct; 79(5):643-58. PubMed ID: 7989274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in faking integrity tests.
    Brown RD; Cothern CM
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):691-702. PubMed ID: 12530710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overt honesty measures predicting admissions: an index of validity or reliability.
    Nicol AA; Paunonen SV
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Feb; 90(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 11899917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.
    Barrick MR; Mount MK
    J Appl Psychol; 1996 Jun; 81(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 8690688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pre-employment integrity testing across multiple industries.
    Fine S
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 21117489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retesting personality in employee selection: implications of the context, sample, and setting.
    Holladay CL; David E; Johnson SK
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):486-501. PubMed ID: 23833877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.
    Honkaniemi L; Tolvanen A; Feldt T
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 21752026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): a factor analysis.
    Li F; Li Y
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Dec; 103(3):727-31. PubMed ID: 19320206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Raymark PH; Roth PL
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):536-52. PubMed ID: 15910148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deliberate faking on personality and emotional intelligence measures.
    Hartman NS; Grubb WL
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Feb; 108(1):120-38. PubMed ID: 21526598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related and situation-related social desirability responding among Chinese teachers.
    Li F; Niu X; Li Y
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(6):667-70. PubMed ID: 22208105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of the testing situation on item responding: cause for concern.
    Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Chan KY; Lee WC; Drasgow F
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):943-53. PubMed ID: 11596810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Demand effects on positive response distortion by police officer applicants on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.
    Detrick P; Chibnall JT; Call C
    J Pers Assess; 2010 Sep; 92(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 20706927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Note on concurrent validation of the personality assessment inventory in law enforcement.
    Hays JR
    Psychol Rep; 1997 Aug; 81(1):244-6. PubMed ID: 9293213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrity, conscientiousness, and honesty.
    Horn J; Nelson CE; Brannick MT
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Aug; 95(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 15460355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive impression management and its influence on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: a comparison of analog and differential prevalence group designs.
    Bagby RM; Marshall MB
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 14593833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liar! Liar! (when stakes are higher): Understanding how the overclaiming technique can be used to measure faking in personnel selection.
    Dunlop PD; Bourdage JS; de Vries RE; McNeill IM; Jorritsma K; Orchard M; Austen T; Baines T; Choe WK
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Aug; 105(8):784-799. PubMed ID: 31714104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positive response distortion by police officer applicants: association of Paulhus Deception Scales With MMPI-2 and Inwald Personality Inventory Validity Scales.
    Detrick P; Chibnall JT
    Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 18258735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of item order on intentional response distortion in the assessment of high potentials: assessing pilot applicants.
    Khorramdel L; Kubinger KD; Uitz A
    Int J Psychol; 2014 Apr; 49(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 24811884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
    Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.