These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7989274)

  • 21. Eysenck personality inventory: impulsivity/neuroticism and social desirability response set.
    Kumari V
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Feb; 78(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 8839293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reconsidering response sets, test-taking attitudes, dissimulation, self-deception, and social desirability.
    Merydith SP; Wallbrown FH
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Dec; 69(3 Pt 1):891-905. PubMed ID: 1784681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Testing the incremental utility of the negative impression-positive impression differential in detecting simulated personality assessment inventory profiles.
    Hopwood CJ; Talbert CA; Morey LC; Rogers R
    J Clin Psychol; 2008 Mar; 64(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 18302214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detecting socially desirable responding with the Personality Assessment Inventory: the Positive Impression Management scale and the Defensiveness Index.
    Peebles J; Moore RJ
    J Clin Psychol; 1998 Aug; 54(5):621-8. PubMed ID: 9696112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Substance versus style: a new look at social desirability in motivating contexts.
    Smith DB; Ellingson JE
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 12002950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validating an inventory for the assessment of egoistic bias and moralistic bias as two separable components of social desirability.
    Musch J; Ostapczuk M; Klaiber Y
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(6):620-9. PubMed ID: 22489614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Social Desirability in Intimate Partner Violence and Relationship Satisfaction Reports: An Exploratory Analysis.
    Visschers J; Jaspaert E; Vervaeke G
    J Interpers Violence; 2017 May; 32(9):1401-1420. PubMed ID: 26058978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impression management ("lie") scales are associated with interpersonally oriented self-control, not other-deception.
    Uziel L
    J Pers; 2014 Jun; 82(3):200-12. PubMed ID: 23750550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Association between alexithymia, neuroticism, and social desirability scores among Italian graduate students.
    Messina A; Fogliani AM; Paradiso S
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Aug; 107(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 20923063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria.
    Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Self-Deceptive Enhancement and Impression Management correlates of EPQ-R dimensions.
    Davies MF; French CC; Keogh E
    J Psychol; 1998 Jul; 132(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 9637022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dimensionality of military professional values items: an exploratory factor analysis of data from the spring 1996 Sample Survey of Military Personnel.
    Schumm WR; Gade PA; Bell DB
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 1):831-41. PubMed ID: 12841452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of feedback expectancy on NEO-Five Factor Inventory scores.
    Scandell DJ; Wlazelek B; Reffie S
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1157-67. PubMed ID: 10932574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of diagnostic measures based on latent class analysis: a step forward in response bias research.
    Thomas ML; Lanyon RI; Millsap RE
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Jun; 21(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 19485677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gender-controlled measures of socially desirable responding.
    Becker G; Cherny SS
    J Clin Psychol; 1994 Sep; 50(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 7806652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The relation between self-reported psychopathic traits and distorted response styles: a meta-analytic review.
    Ray JV; Hall J; Rivera-Hudson N; Poythress NG; Lilienfeld SO; Morano M
    Personal Disord; 2013 Jan; 4(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 22452779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Self-report: psychology's four-letter word.
    Haeffel GJ; Howard GS
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 20518434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of social desirability response bias on STAXI-2 profiles in a clinical forensic sample.
    McEwan TE; Davis MR; MacKenzie R; Mullen PE
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2009 Nov; 48(Pt 4):431-6. PubMed ID: 19555524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relationship between the FFM and personality disorders in a personnel selection sample.
    Nederström M; Furnham A
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Oct; 53(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 22882662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations.
    Cao M; Drasgow F
    J Appl Psychol; 2019 Nov; 104(11):1347-1368. PubMed ID: 31070382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.