BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7989275)

  • 1. Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for cognitive ability tests: implications for range restriction corrections in validation research.
    Sackett PR; Ostgaard DJ
    J Appl Psychol; 1994 Oct; 79(5):680-4. PubMed ID: 7989275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for personality scales: implications for range-restriction corrections in validation research.
    Ones DS; Viswesvaran C
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Jun; 88(3):570-7. PubMed ID: 12814305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who r u?: On the (in)accuracy of incumbent-based estimates of range restriction in criterion-related and differential validity research.
    Roth PL; Le H; Oh IS; Van Iddekinge CH; Robbins SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 May; 102(5):802-828. PubMed ID: 28150987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A test of a proposed method for estimating validity of a multivariate composite predictor: extending the job component validity model.
    Hoffman CC; Morris D; Luck G
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):900-16. PubMed ID: 20099553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment centers versus cognitive ability tests: Challenging the conventional wisdom on criterion-related validity.
    Sackett PR; Shewach OR; Keiser HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Oct; 102(10):1435-1447. PubMed ID: 28530416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Substance versus style: a new look at social desirability in motivating contexts.
    Smith DB; Ellingson JE
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 12002950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes.
    Chapman DS; Uggerslev KL; Carroll SA; Piasentin KA; Jones DA
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Sep; 90(5):928-44. PubMed ID: 16162065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personality comparison of airline pilot incumbents, applicants, and the general population norms on the 16PF.
    Wakcher S; Cross K; Blackman MC
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 1):773-80. PubMed ID: 12841441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personality traits within a pediatric surgery fellowship applicant pool.
    Hazboun R; Rodriguez S; Thirumoorthi A; Baerg J; Moores D; Tagge EP
    J Surg Res; 2017 Oct; 218():298-305. PubMed ID: 28985865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody status on military applicant aptitude test scores.
    Arday DR; Brundage JF; Gardner LI; Goldenbaum M; Wann F; Wright S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Jun; 133(12):1210-9. PubMed ID: 2063829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retaking ability tests in a selection setting: implications for practice effects, training performance, and turnover.
    Hausknecht JP; Trevor CO; Farr JL
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):243-54. PubMed ID: 12002953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of response instructions and response format on applicant perceptions of a situational judgement test for medical school selection.
    De Leng WE; Stegers-Jager KM; Born MP; Themmen APN
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):282. PubMed ID: 30477494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. More than g: selection quality and adverse impact implications of considering second-stratum cognitive abilities.
    Wee S; Newman DA; Joseph DL
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Jul; 99(4):547-63. PubMed ID: 24295534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personnel selection and the five-factor model: reexamining the effects of appplicant's frame of reference.
    Smith DB; Hanges PJ; Dickson MW
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 11393442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Broad cognitive abilities of children with mental retardation: an analysis of group and individual profiles.
    Bergeron R; Floyd RG
    Am J Ment Retard; 2006 Nov; 111(6):417-32. PubMed ID: 17029499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are applicants more likely to quit longer assessments? Examining the effect of assessment length on applicant attrition behavior.
    Hardy JH; Gibson C; Sloan M; Carr A
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Jul; 102(7):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 28333499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.
    Cheng Y; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):369-83. PubMed ID: 18534047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships between surgical ability ratings and spatial abilities and personality.
    Deary IJ; Graham KS; Maran AG
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Apr; 37(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 1377267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of an instrument to measure understanding of pattern by elementary school children.
    Berlin DF; White AL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1225-6. PubMed ID: 1501992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using practice employment tests to improve recruitment and personnel selection outcomes for organizations and job seekers.
    Campion MC; Campion ED; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2019 Sep; 104(9):1089-1102. PubMed ID: 30869924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.