These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7989275)

  • 21. The application process influences the applicant pool--we can send the applicants a message.
    Bloxham D
    J Dent Educ; 1996 May; 60(5):419-21. PubMed ID: 8636507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.
    Honkaniemi L; Tolvanen A; Feldt T
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 21752026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries.
    Murphy KR; Dzieweczynski JL; Zhang Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1018-31. PubMed ID: 19594241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characteristics of the applicant pool to vascular surgery residency programs.
    Eidt JF; Chaikof E; Sidawy AN;
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Sep; 42(3):519-23. PubMed ID: 16171600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Individual differences.
    THORNDIKE RL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1950; 1():87-104. PubMed ID: 14771868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part I.
    Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 22000541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relative importance of personality and general mental ability in managers' judgments of applicant qualifications.
    Dunn WS; Mount MK; Barrick MR; Ones DS
    J Appl Psychol; 1995 Aug; 80(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 7642460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.
    Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Longitudinal trends in the applicant pool for U.S. medical schools, 1974--1999.
    Hall FR; Mikesell C; Cranston P; Julian E; Elam C
    Acad Med; 2001 Aug; 76(8):829-34. PubMed ID: 11500287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential validity for cognitive ability tests in employment and educational settings: not much more than range restriction?
    Roth PL; Le H; Oh IS; Van Iddekinge CH; Buster MA; Robbins SB; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Jan; 99(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 24079670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Response distortion on personality tests in applicants: comparing high-stakes to low-stakes medical settings.
    Anglim J; Bozic S; Little J; Lievens F
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 May; 23(2):311-321. PubMed ID: 29022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using individual differences to predict job performance: correcting for direct and indirect restriction of range.
    Sjöberg S; Sjöberg A; Näswall K; Sverke M
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 22612634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Faking good: self-enhancement in medical school applicants.
    Griffin B; Wilson IG
    Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 22515756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Searching for the right fit: development of applicant person-organization fit perceptions during the recruitment process.
    Swider BW; Zimmerman RD; Barrick MR
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):880-93. PubMed ID: 25486257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Facial attractiveness, applicants' qualifications, and judges' expertise about decisions in preselective recruitment.
    Dubois M; Pansu P
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1129-34. PubMed ID: 15762393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recruitment efforts to reduce adverse impact: targeted recruiting for personality, cognitive ability, and diversity.
    Newman DA; Lyon JS
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):298-317. PubMed ID: 19271792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A house divided: cooperative and competitive recruitment in vital industries.
    Willis WK; Muslin I; Timko KN
    J Nurs Manag; 2016 Mar; 24(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 25900514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The nonlinear relationship between atypical applicant experience and hiring: The red flags perspective.
    Wechtler HM; Lee CISG; Heyden MLM; Felps W; Lee TW
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 May; 107(5):776-794. PubMed ID: 34591559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The construct validity of the Multidimensional Aptitude Battery: a word of caution.
    Kranzler JH
    J Clin Psychol; 1991 Sep; 47(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 1939716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection.
    Lievens F; Patterson F
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):927-40. PubMed ID: 21480685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.