These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7989614)

  • 1. An in vitro study of oscillating instruments for root planing.
    Mengel R; Buns C; Stelzel M; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Sep; 21(8):513-8. PubMed ID: 7989614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
    Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using manual, ultrasonic and rotary instruments: an in vitro study using scanning electron microscopy.
    Marda P; Prakash S; Devaraj CG; Vastardis S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 22945704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the effects of various periodontal rotary instruments on surface characteristics of root surface.
    Kishida M; Sato S; Ito K
    J Oral Sci; 2004 Mar; 46(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15141717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro study of various instruments for root planing.
    Mengel R; Stelzel M; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L; Diekwisch T
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Dec; 17(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 9497746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effectiveness of scaling and root planing with curets designed for deep pockets.
    Nagy RJ; Otomo-Corgel J; Stambaugh R
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12):954-9. PubMed ID: 1474467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparative study of a reciprocating scaler for root surface debridement.
    Lee A; Heasman PA; Kelly PJ
    J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):81-6. PubMed ID: 8636498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a new periodontal curet. An in vitro study.
    Singer DL; Long BA; Lozanoff S; Senthilselvan A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):549-52. PubMed ID: 1447379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study.
    Maritato M; Orazi L; Laurito D; Formisano G; Serra E; Lollobrigida M; Molinari A; De Biase A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 Nov; 16(4):553-558. PubMed ID: 29797806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histological and profilometric evaluation of the root surface after instrumentation with a new piezoelectric device - ex vivo study.
    Silva D; Martins O; Matos S; Lopes P; Rolo T; Baptista I
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 24995862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root surface smoothness or roughness following open debridement. An in vivo study.
    Schlageter L; Rateitschak-Plüss EM; Schwarz JP
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):460-4. PubMed ID: 8783052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loss of tooth substance during root planing with various periodontal instruments: an in vitro study.
    Obeid P; Bercy P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Jun; 9(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 15838684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the effects of periodontal rotary instruments and Gracey curettes on root surface characteristics: an in vivo SEM study.
    Dwivedi S; Verma SJ
    Quintessence Int; 2012; 43(10):e135-40. PubMed ID: 23115772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The periodontally-involved root surface.
    Corbet EF; Vaughan AJ; Kieser JB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Jul; 20(6):402-10. PubMed ID: 8349832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser radiation, the Vector system and hand instruments on periodontally diseased root surfaces in vivo.
    Schwarz F; Bieling K; Venghaus S; Sculean A; Jepsen S; Becker J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 16489946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces.
    Frentzen M; Braun A; Aniol D
    J Periodontol; 2002 May; 73(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 12027255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo.
    Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Leal PC; Gimenes-Sakima PP; Marcantonio E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18060565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planing on multi-rooted teeth.
    Wylam JM; Mealey BL; Mills MP; Waldrop TC; Moskowicz DC
    J Periodontol; 1993 Nov; 64(11):1023-8. PubMed ID: 8295086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.