These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7989819)

  • 1. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Study on perception of Shanghai population with labial profile].
    Tang GH; Ji GP; Ding XJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Apr; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 14661511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women.
    Baudouin JY; Tiberghien G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Nov; 117(3):313-32. PubMed ID: 15500809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston C; Hunt O; Burden D; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 15817618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationships between facial features in the perception of profile attractiveness.
    Torsello F; Graci M; Grande NM; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 20974445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contribution of malocclusion and female facial attractiveness to smile esthetics evaluated by eye tracking.
    Richards MR; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Walther DB; Rosenstiel S; Sacksteder JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):472-82. PubMed ID: 25836007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile.
    Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study.
    Tatarunaite E; Playle R; Hood K; Shaw W; Richmond S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):676-82; quiz 755. PubMed ID: 15953892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness.
    Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The attractive lip: A photomorphometric analysis.
    Penna V; Fricke A; Iblher N; Eisenhardt SU; Stark GB
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):920-9. PubMed ID: 25921652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Esthetic preferences for facial soft tissue profiles.
    Sukhia RH; Khan M; Fida M; Shaikh A; Azam SI
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):17-23. PubMed ID: 22031990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.