These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7989962)
1. Effect of smear layer removal agent and/or fluoride on the surface of dentin. Tsujimoto Y; Murakami Y; Kozuka M; Ukaji A; Yamazaki M J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1994 Sep; 36(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 7989962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dye penetration of the smear layer and fluoride application to the dentin surface. Tsujimoto Y; Motoki T; Kitazume N; Wada M; Yamazaki M J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1990 Dec; 32(4):294-304. PubMed ID: 2127426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Smear layer and surface state affect dentin fluoride uptake. Buchalla W; Lennon AM; Becker K; Lucke T; Attin T Arch Oral Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(10):932-7. PubMed ID: 17512896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effect of various pretreatments for dentin bonding on dentin permeability]. Tagami J; Sugizaki J; Hosoda H Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Mar; 9(2):240-6. PubMed ID: 2135514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adhesion of dentin bonding agents after smear layer treatments. Davis EL; Wieczkowski G; Yu XY; Joynt RB; Gallo J Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 1524739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of 25% tannic acid on prepared dentin: a scanning electron microscope-methylene blue dye study. Bitter NC J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jul; 64(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 2384896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of smear layer removal on marginal contraction gaps. Soh G; Sidhu SK J Oral Rehabil; 1994 Jul; 21(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 7965352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of desensitizing agents on dentin permeability and dentinal tubule occlusion: an in vitro study. Oberg C; Pochapski MT; Farago PV; Granado CJ; Pilatti GL; Santos FA Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):496-501; quiz 502-3, 535-6. PubMed ID: 19903641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dentin morphology and permeability after brushing with different toothpastes in the presence and absence of smear layer. Prati C; Venturi L; Valdrè G; Mongiorgi R J Periodontol; 2002 Feb; 73(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 11895284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition. Inoue S; Abe Y; Yoshida Y; De Munck J; Sano H; Suzuki K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):685-92. PubMed ID: 15646225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [An ultrastructural analysis of dentin treated with chemical agents]. Goracci G; Mori G; Casa de' Martinis L; Bazzucchi M Minerva Stomatol; 1993; 42(7-8):313-25. PubMed ID: 8295620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scanning electron microscopy and dentinal permeability analysis of smear layer. Prati C; Mongiorgi R; Pashley DH; Riva di Sanseverino L Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1991 May; 67(5):481-5. PubMed ID: 1805880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of rotary instrumentation and different etchants on removal of smear layer on human dentin. Ayad MF J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 11174681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of an experimental anhydrous stannous fluoride dentifrice on the acid resistance of dentin smear layers. Burnett GR Am J Dent; 2013 Mar; 26 Spec No A():15A-18A. PubMed ID: 23833914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficiency of different polyacrylic acid concentrations on the smear layer, after ART technique, by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Raggio DP; Sônego FG; Camargo LB; Marquezan M; Imparato JC Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Oct; 11(5):232-5. PubMed ID: 20932397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Pereira PN; Yamada T; Tei R; Tagami J Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9545887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Etching effect of 17% EDTA and a non-rinse conditioner (NRC) on primary enamel and dentin. Cehreli ZC; Altay N Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11764828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Closing of dentinal tubules by glutardialdehyde treatment, a scanning electron microscopy study. Dijkman GE; Jongebloed WL; de Vries J; Ogaard B; Arends J Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):144-50. PubMed ID: 8085120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Permeability and morphology of dentin after erosion induced by acidic drinks. Prati C; Montebugnoli L; Suppa P; Valdrè G; Mongiorgi R J Periodontol; 2003 Apr; 74(4):428-36. PubMed ID: 12747446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of root canal irrigants on cervical dentine permeability to hydrogen peroxide. Surapipongpuntr P; Duangcharee W; Kwangsamai S; Ekka A Int Endod J; 2008 Oct; 41(10):821-7. PubMed ID: 18699786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]