These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7990038)

  • 1. Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Yip RL; Chavez MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 7990038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The adhesive amalgam--fact or fiction?
    Temple-Smithson PE; Causton BE; Marshall KF
    Br Dent J; 1992 Apr; 172(8):316-9. PubMed ID: 1591117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage and SEM interfacial micromorphology of amalgam restorations using three adhesive systems.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):423-8. PubMed ID: 10856807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives.
    al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retentive strength of an amalgam bonding agent: chemical vs light vs dual curing.
    Winkler MM; Rhodes B; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):505-11. PubMed ID: 11203863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture resistance of composite and amalgam cores retained by pins coated with new adhesive resins.
    Tjan AH; Dunn JR; Grant BE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jun; 67(6):752-60. PubMed ID: 1403855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Lacy AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):257-60. PubMed ID: 1501170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding characteristics of a phosphonated anaerobic adhesive to amalgam.
    Watts DC; Devlin H; Fletcher JE
    J Dent; 1992 Aug; 20(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 1430516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of two resin adhesives on mechanical properties of set amalgam.
    Millstein PL; Naguib GH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):106-9. PubMed ID: 7674180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amalgam bonding: visualization and clinical implications of adhesive displacement during amalgam condensation.
    Tyler DW; Thurmeier J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 11203781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bonding amalgam to dentin by different methods.
    Hadavi F; Hey JH; Strasdin RB; McMeekin GP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Sep; 72(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 7965897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.
    Charlton DG; Moore BK; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Amalgam restorations: a new approach.
    al-Duwairi Y; Hadj-Hamou R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 8429504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.