These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7991127)

  • 1. The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue, and finger.
    Van Boven RW; Johnson KO
    Neurology; 1994 Dec; 44(12):2361-6. PubMed ID: 7991127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tactile spatial acuity at the human fingertip and lip: bilateral symmetry and interdigit variability.
    Sathian K; Zangaladze A
    Neurology; 1996 May; 46(5):1464-6. PubMed ID: 8628503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of spatial acuity at the fingertip with grating (JVP) domes: validity for use in an elderly population.
    Remblay F; Backman A; Cuenco A; Vant K; Wassef MA
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2000; 17(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 10833085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity.
    Craig JC
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1999; 16(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 10527368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tactile spatial resolution in blind braille readers.
    Van Boven RW; Hamilton RH; Kauffman T; Keenan JP; Pascual-Leone A
    Neurology; 2000 Jun; 54(12):2230-6. PubMed ID: 10881245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tactile spatial acuity in elderly persons: assessment with grating domes and relationship with manual dexterity.
    Tremblay F; Wong K; Sanderson R; Coté L
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2003; 20(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 12850821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative roles of spatial and intensive cues in the discrimination of spatial tactile stimuli.
    Gibson GO; Craig JC
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Oct; 64(7):1095-107. PubMed ID: 12489664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of square-wave gratings to assess perioral spatial acuity.
    Patel J; Essick GK; Kelly DG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Jun; 55(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 9191641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tactile roughness discrimination of the finger pad relies primarily on vibration sensitive afferents not necessarily located in the hand.
    Libouton X; Barbier O; Berger Y; Plaghki L; Thonnard JL
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 229(1):273-9. PubMed ID: 22265887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tactile co-activation improves detection of afferent spatial modulation.
    Gibson GO; Makinson CD; Sathian K
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Apr; 194(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 19198816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tactile discrimination of gaps by slowly adapting afferents: effects of population parameters and anisotropy in the fingerpad.
    Wheat HE; Goodwin AW
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 84(3):1430-44. PubMed ID: 10980016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anisotropy and spatial tactile acuity on human lips.
    Todd G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Aug; 123(8):1593-8. PubMed ID: 22336132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hand posture, but not vision of the hand, affects tactile spatial resolution in the grating orientation discrimination task.
    French B; Chiaro NVD; Holmes NP
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Oct; 240(10):2715-2723. PubMed ID: 36074176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential effects of synchronous and asynchronous multifinger coactivation on human tactile performance.
    Kalisch T; Tegenthoff M; Dinse HR
    BMC Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 8():58. PubMed ID: 17663778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A physical constraint on perceptual learning: tactile spatial acuity improves with training to a limit set by finger size.
    Wong M; Peters RM; Goldreich D
    J Neurosci; 2013 May; 33(22):9345-52. PubMed ID: 23719803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postural stabilization from fingertip contact II. Relationships between age, tactile sensibility and magnitude of contact forces.
    Tremblay F; Mireault AC; Dessureault L; Manning H; Sveistrup H
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 164(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 15754171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tactile learning is task specific but transfers between fingers.
    Sathian K; Zangaladze A
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 9038414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: changes over the life span.
    Stevens JC; Patterson MQ
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1995; 12(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 7571941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity.
    Gibson GO; Craig JC
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 170(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 16307264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing.
    Bensmaïa SJ; Craig JC; Johnson KO
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 95(3):1783-91. PubMed ID: 16236778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.