These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7991338)

  • 1. Field sobriety tests: are they designed for failure?
    Cole S; Nowaczyk RH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 1):99-104. PubMed ID: 7991338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judging intoxication.
    Rubenzer S
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(1):116-37. PubMed ID: 20623796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intervening to decrease the probability of alcohol-impaired driving: Impact of novel field sobriety tests.
    Smith RC; Robinson Z; Bazdar A; Geller ES
    J Prev Interv Community; 2016; 44(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 27309028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the standardized field sobriety test battery at 0.08% blood alcohol concentration.
    Stuster J
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(3):608-14. PubMed ID: 17063973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the use and benefit of passive alcohol sensors during routine traffic stops.
    Fell JC; Compton C
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2007; 51():437-48. PubMed ID: 18184506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of sobriety tests for the marine environment.
    Fiorentino DD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):870-7. PubMed ID: 21376878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drinking drivers missed at sobriety checkpoints.
    Wells JK; Greene MA; Foss RD; Ferguson SA; Williams AF
    J Stud Alcohol; 1997 Sep; 58(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 9273917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The validity of police assessment of driver intoxication in motor vehicle crashes leading to hospitalization.
    Grossman DC; Mueller BA; Kenaston T; Salzberg P; Cooper W; Jurkovich GJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 1996 Jul; 28(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 8870770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An examination of the validity of the standardized field sobriety test in detecting drug impairment using data from the Drug Evaluation and Classification program.
    Porath-Waller AJ; Beirness DJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 24345013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sleep deprivation does not mimic alcohol intoxication on field sobriety testing.
    Citek K; Elmont AD; Jons CL; Krezelok CJ; Neron JD; Plummer TA; Tannenbaum T
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1170-9. PubMed ID: 21595697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using a multidimensional Rasch model approach to measure the police's perceived ability to detect, detain and intercept DWI vehicles when conducting sobriety checkpoints.
    Chang HL; Shih CK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Sep; 48():505-17. PubMed ID: 22664717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canada's new drug-impaired driving law: the need to consider other approaches.
    Solomon R; Chamberlain E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):685-93. PubMed ID: 24380375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sobriety checkpoints in Thailand: a review of effectiveness and developments over time.
    Ditsuwan V; Veerman JL; Bertram M; Vos T
    Asia Pac J Public Health; 2015 Mar; 27(2):NP2177-87. PubMed ID: 22186383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Victorian legislative framework for testing drivers for impairment caused by drugs other than alcohol: an evaluation of the characteristics of drivers detected from 2000 to 2005.
    Boorman M; Papafotiou K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2007 Sep; 8(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 17710710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survey regarding the 0.05 blood alcohol concentration limit for driving in the United States.
    Fiorentino DD; Martin BD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 May; 19(4):345-351. PubMed ID: 29333873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A field test of substance use screening devices as part of routine drunk-driving spot detection operating procedures in South Africa.
    Matzopoulos R; Lasarow A; Bowman B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():118-24. PubMed ID: 23770390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical evaluation of standardized field sobriety tests.
    Hlastala MP; Polissar NL; Oberman S
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 May; 50(3):662-9. PubMed ID: 15932104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Police documentation of alcohol involvement in hospitalized injured drivers.
    Brubacher JR; Chan H; Fang M; Brown D; Purssell R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(5):453-60. PubMed ID: 23683066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drug identification performance on the basis of observable signs and symptoms.
    Shinar D; Schechtman E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Sep; 37(5):843-51. PubMed ID: 15885613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why are sobriety checkpoints not widely adopted as an enforcement strategy in the United States?
    Fell JC; Ferguson SA; Williams AF; Fields M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2003 Nov; 35(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 12971924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.