These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7991361)

  • 1. A body powered prehensor with variable mechanical advantage.
    Frey DD; Carlson LE
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 7991361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of body-powered voluntary opening and voluntary closing prehensor for activities of daily life.
    Berning K; Cohick S; Johnson R; Miller LA; Sensinger JW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 24933723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and evaluation of voluntary opening and voluntary closing prosthetic terminal device.
    Sensinger JW; Lipsey J; Thomas A; Turner K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 26186081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Force-directed design of a voluntary closing hand prosthesis.
    de Visser H; Herder JL
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2000; 37(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 10917258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Wearable Testbed for Studying Variable Transmission in Body-Powered Prosthetic Gripping.
    McPherson AIW; Abbott ME; White W; Gloumakov Y; Stuart HS
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2023 Sep; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 37941256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High Cable Forces Deteriorate Pinch Force Control in Voluntary-Closing Body-Powered Prostheses.
    Hichert M; Abbink DA; Kyberd PJ; Plettenburg DH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169996. PubMed ID: 28099454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of voluntary closing hand and hook prostheses.
    Smit G; Plettenburg DH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Dec; 34(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 20849359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is body powered operation of upper limb prostheses feasible for young limb deficient children?
    Shaperman J; Leblanc M; Setoguchi Y; McNeal DR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1995 Dec; 19(3):165-75. PubMed ID: 8927528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating Reachable Workspace and User Control Over Prehensor Aperture for a Body-Powered Prosthesis.
    Chadwell A; Kenney L; Howard D; Ssekitoleko RT; Nakandi BT; Head J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Sep; 28(9):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 32746324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of a new, above-elbow, body-powered prosthetic arm: a final report.
    Cupo ME; Sheredos SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Oct; 35(4):431-46. PubMed ID: 10220222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development?
    Smit G; Bongers RM; Van der Sluis CK; Plettenburg DH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 22773256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception and control of low cable operation forces in voluntary closing body-powered upper-limb prostheses.
    Hichert M; Abbink DA; Vardy AN; van der Sluis CK; Janssen WGM; Brouwers MAH; Plettenburg DH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225263. PubMed ID: 31756222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing the Force-Motion Tradeoff in Body-Powered Transmission Design.
    Abbott ME; Stuart HS
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():3064-3074. PubMed ID: 37471179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of a passive capstan based grasp enhancement feature in a voluntary-closing prosthetic terminal device.
    Gemmell KD; Leddy MT; Belter JT; Dollar AM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5019-5025. PubMed ID: 28269396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An experimental apparatus to simulate body-powered prosthetic usage: Development and preliminary evaluation.
    Gao F; Rodriguez J; Kapp S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 25820641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design of a 3D-printed hand prosthesis featuring articulated bio-inspired fingers.
    Cuellar JS; Plettenburg D; Zadpoor AA; Breedveld P; Smit G
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Mar; 235(3):336-345. PubMed ID: 33292076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The design and development of a gloveless endoskeletal prosthetic hand.
    Doshi R; Yeh C; LeBlanc M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Oct; 35(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 10220216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical evaluation of the "Hüfner hand" prosthesis.
    Smit G
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Feb; 45(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 33834745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of a prototype foot/ankle prosthesis.
    Quesada PM; Pitkin M; Colvin J
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 2000 Mar; 8(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 10779119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Step-to-step transition work during level and inclined walking using passive and powered ankle-foot prostheses.
    Russell Esposito E; Aldridge Whitehead JM; Wilken JM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 25628378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.