These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7991364)

  • 1. Experiences with respect to the ICEROSS system for trans-tibial prostheses.
    Cluitmans J; Geboers M; Deckers J; Rings F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 7991364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome of fitting an ICEROSS prosthesis: views of trans-tibial amputees.
    Datta D; Vaidya SK; Howitt J; Gopalan L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1996 Aug; 20(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 8876004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ICEROSS--a consensus view: a questionnaire survey of the use of ICEROSS in the United Kingdom.
    McCurdie I; Hanspal R; Nieveen R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Aug; 21(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 9285956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between the suction suspension system and the hypobaric Iceross Seal-In® X5 in transtibial amputees.
    Brunelli S; Delussu AS; Paradisi F; Pellegrini R; Traballesi M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Dec; 37(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 23436696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Suspension effect and dynamic evaluation of the total surface bearing (TSB) trans-tibial prosthesis: a comparison with the patellar tendon bearing (PTB) trans-tibial prosthesis.
    Narita H; Yokogushi K; Shii S; Kakizawa M; Nosaka T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 9453088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Silicone roll-on suspension for upper limb prostheses: users' views.
    Gaber TA; Gardner CM; Kirker SG
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Aug; 25(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 11573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective benefits of energy storing prostheses.
    Alaranta H; Lempinen VM; Haavisto E; Pohjolainen T; Hurri H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 7991366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A questionnaire survey of the effect of different interface types on patient satisfaction and perceived problems among trans-tibial amputees.
    Van de Weg FB; Van der Windt DA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 16466153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved comfort and function of arm prosthesis after implantation of a Humerus-T-Prosthesis in trans-humeral amputees.
    Witsø E; Kristensen T; Benum P; Sivertsen S; Persen L; Funderud A; Magne T; Aursand HP; Aamodt A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 17162517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The performance of the ICEROSS prostheses amongst transtibial amputees with a special reference to the workplace--a preliminary study. Icelandic Roll on Silicone Socket.
    Dasgupta AK; McCluskie PJ; Patel VS; Robins L
    Occup Med (Lond); 1997 May; 47(4):228-36. PubMed ID: 9231496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Residual limb wounds or ulcers heal in transtibial amputees using an active suction socket system. A randomized controlled study.
    Traballesi M; Delussu AS; Fusco A; Iosa M; Averna T; Pellegrini R; Brunelli S
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Dec; 48(4):613-23. PubMed ID: 22641248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Case study: Correction of angular deformity post-trans-tibial amputation to improve prosthesis fit and comfort.
    Lineham B; Harwood P; Giannoudis P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 24469427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses.
    Baars EC; Geertzen JH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 16180375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weight bearing and velocity in trans-tibial and trans-femoral amputees.
    Jones ME; Bashford GM; Mann JM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 9453090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets: a comparison between CAD CAM and conventionally produced sockets.
    Oberg T; Lilja M; Johansson T; Karsznia A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 8134276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
    Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical field-testing of ATLAS prosthetic system for trans-tibial amputees.
    Jensen JS; Raab W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Aug; 26(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 12227454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relaxed versus activated stump muscles during casting for trans-tibial prostheses.
    Lilja M; Johansson S; Oberg T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10355639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional versus microchip controlled pneumatic swing phase control for trans-femoral amputees: user's verdict.
    Datta D; Howitt J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Aug; 22(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 9747997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ICEROSS concept: a discussion of a philosophy.
    Kristinsson O
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Apr; 17(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8337100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.