117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7992038)
1. EPA dioxin reassessment.
Bradfield CA; Gallo MA; Gasiewicz TA; Greenberg RS; Greenlee WF; Margolick J; Mattison DR; Munson P; Neal RA; Okey AB
Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5191):1628-9. PubMed ID: 7992038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toxicology. Panel backs EPA dioxin assessment.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Nov; 290(5494):1071. PubMed ID: 11184998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Toxicology. Just how bad is dioxin?
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Jun; 288(5473):1941-4. PubMed ID: 10877704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Evaluation (2001) of the EPA dioxin reassessment.
Paustenbach DJ;
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Oct; 36(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 12460755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dioxin draft sparks controversy.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 May; 288(5470):1313-4. PubMed ID: 10847834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dioxin report faces scientific gauntlet.
Stone R
Science; 1994 Sep; 265(5179):1650. PubMed ID: 8085150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dioxin review blues.
Environ Health Perspect; 1995 Feb; 103(2):137. PubMed ID: 7737054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. EPA rebuffs challenge to its assessment of dioxin data.
Reichardt T
Nature; 1994 Sep; 371(6495):272. PubMed ID: 8090187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the human health risks from polychlorinated dioxins and furans in stack gas emissions from combustion units: implications of USEPA's dioxin reassessment.
Bell JU
Waste Manag; 2002; 22(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 12099498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EPA moves to reassess the risk of dioxin.
Roberts L
Science; 1991 May; 252(5008):911. PubMed ID: 2035022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clearing the air on EPA study of MWI dioxin emissions.
Doucet LG
Health Facil Manage; 1995 Aug; 8(8):78, 80, 82 passim. PubMed ID: 10144447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. No evidence of dioxin cancer threshold.
Mackie D; Liu J; Loh YS; Thomas V
Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Jul; 111(9):1145-7. PubMed ID: 12842764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dioxin and advisory board.
Clapp R; Ozonoff D; Silverstone A; Weiss B
Science; 1995 Sep; 269(5228):1204-5. PubMed ID: 7652563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dioxin: dangerous as expected.
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Aug; 102(8):622. PubMed ID: 7895698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Science.
von Mühlendahl KE
Eur J Pediatr; 1995 Mar; 154(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 7758528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Panel slams EPA's dioxin analysis.
Stone R
Science; 1995 May; 268(5214):1124. PubMed ID: 7761824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Revisions in cancer policy.
Marshall E
Science; 1983 Apr; 220(4592):36-7. PubMed ID: 6828879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Indirect exposure assessment at the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Lorber M
Toxicol Ind Health; 2001 Jun; 17(5-10):145-56. PubMed ID: 12539859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dioxin data contested.
Howlett CT
Public Health Rep; 1996; 111(6):473-5. PubMed ID: 8955688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dioxin is a promoter blocker, a promoter, and a net anticarcinogen.
Kayajanian G
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Aug; 26(1 Pt 1):134-7. PubMed ID: 9339490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
