46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7992497)
21. The value of MRI in silicone granuloma of the breast.
Helbich TH; Wunderbaldinger P; Plenk H; Deutinger M; Breitenseher M; Mostbeck GH
Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 9097058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Breast MRI: Artefacts and pitfalls].
Salem C; Chopier J; Perrot N; Darai E; Thomassin-Naggara I
J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 92(12):1053-9. PubMed ID: 22153037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Artifacts and pitfalls in the interpretation of breast magnetic resonance imaging].
del Riego J; Villajos M
Radiologia; 2013; 55(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 23276714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pitfalls of breast MRI.
Coulthard A; Potterton AJ
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 73(870):665-71. PubMed ID: 10911793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Concerning the paper by Kenny et al, entitled: "Computed model of gadolinium enhanced MRI of breast disease" (Eur. J. Radiol. 24 (1997) 109-119).
Pedevilla M; Stollbergerp R
Eur J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 25(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 9430834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Recognizing and interpreting artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the breast.
Ojeda-Fournier H; Choe KA; Mahoney MC
Radiographics; 2007 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S147-64. PubMed ID: 18180224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Breast MR imaging artifacts: how to recognize and fix them.
Harvey JA; Hendrick RE; Coll JM; Nicholson BT; Burkholder BT; Cohen MA
Radiographics; 2007 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S131-45. PubMed ID: 18180223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Dynamic imaging with magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of breast disease].
Ercolani P; Giovagnoni A; Giuseppetti G; Baldassarre S; De Nigris E; Amici F
Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 1767046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Magnetic resonance tomography of the breast. The results of 253 examinations].
Kaiser WA
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1989 Sep; 114(36):1351-7. PubMed ID: 2776660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Quantitative dynamic contrast breast-MRI with the 0.5 tesla equipment].
Klengel S; Hietschold V; Schreiber M; Köhler K
Rontgenpraxis; 1994 Aug; 47(8):223-8. PubMed ID: 7974011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI.
Sommer H; Tiling R; Pechmann M; Kindermann G; Kress K; Moser R; Tatsch K; Hahn K; Pfluger T; Assemi C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. II. The capacity to differentiate malignant and benign lesions in MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Gieseke J; Elevelt A; Reiser M; Schild HH
Rofo; 1995 Jun; 162(6):482-91. PubMed ID: 7605960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) of the breast in problem patients].
Brezina A; Schwaighofer BW
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1994; 106(18):584-9. PubMed ID: 7992497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
