These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7993040)

  • 1. A comparison of aesthetic inlay systems.
    Bishop BM
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 1994 Apr; 12():119-30. PubMed ID: 7993040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review.
    Terry DA; Touati B
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(1):51-8; quiz 60. PubMed ID: 11301531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The ceramic inlay].
    Arnold M; Ernst FD; Wenzel W
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Apr; 24(4):464-9. PubMed ID: 4525192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inlay restorations.
    Roulet JF; Degrange M
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):48-62. PubMed ID: 9120613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear.
    Kawai K; Isenberg BP; Leinfelder KF
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8190882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ceramic inlay movement during polymerization of resin luting cements.
    Sorensen JA; Munksgaard EC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1995 Jun; 103(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 7634136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current developments in the esthetic inlay/onlay.
    Leinfelder KF
    Dent Econ; 1994 Nov; 84(11):76-7. PubMed ID: 8612892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The indirect aesthetic inlay/onlay.
    Hoard RJ
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1993; 72(5):16-8. PubMed ID: 8040716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inlays and onlays.
    Roulet JF; Lösche GM; Noack M
    Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1993; ():41-54. PubMed ID: 8401823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Luting composite thickness of two ceramic inlay systems.
    Sertgöz A; Gemalmaz D; Alkumru H; Yoruç B
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Jun; 3(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8601157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ceramic inlays and onlays].
    van Pelt AW; de Kloet HJ; van der Kuy P
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):472-6. PubMed ID: 11921995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Esthetic posterior restorations utilizing the double-inlay technique: a novel approach in esthetic dentistry.
    Hannig M; Schmeiser R
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Feb; 28(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 10332359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cerana--a direct ceramic inlay technique.
    Millar BJ
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Apr; 6(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 11819882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-office inlays with today's new materials.
    Abel MG
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Oct; 42(4):657-64. PubMed ID: 9891648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
    Molin MK; Karlsson SL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.