These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7993164)

  • 1. Four methods for characterizing disability in the formation of function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Hamilton BB; Granger CV; Goin JE; Escarce JJ; Williams SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Dec; 75(12):1277-83. PubMed ID: 7993164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional gain and length of stay for major rehabilitation impairment categories. Patterns revealed by function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Hamilton BB; Goin JE; Granger CV; Fiedler RC
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1996; 75(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 8645443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discharge motor FIM-function related groups.
    Stineman MG; Goin JE; Granger CV; Fiedler R; Williams SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 78(9):980-5. PubMed ID: 9305272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG; Escarce JJ; Goin JE; Hamilton BB; Granger CV; Williams SV
    Med Care; 1994 Apr; 32(4):366-79. PubMed ID: 8139301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories.
    Stineman MG; Shea JA; Jette A; Tassoni CJ; Ottenbacher KJ; Fiedler R; Granger CV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1101-8. PubMed ID: 8931518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic coding and medical rehabilitation length of stay: their relationship.
    Stineman MG; Escarce JJ; Tassoni CJ; Goin JE; Granger CV; Williams SV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Mar; 79(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 9523773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of functional independence measure-function related groups and resource utilization groups-version III systems across post acute settings.
    Eilertsen TB; Kramer AM; Schlenker RE; Hrincevich CA
    Med Care; 1998 May; 36(5):695-705. PubMed ID: 9596060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classifying rehabilitation inpatients by expected functional gain.
    Stineman MG; Goin JE; Tassoni CJ; Granger CV; Williams SV
    Med Care; 1997 Sep; 35(9):963-73. PubMed ID: 9298084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of function-related groups version 2.0: a classification system for medical rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG; Tassoni CJ; Escarce JJ; Goin JE; Granger CV; Fiedler RC; Williams SV
    Health Serv Res; 1997 Oct; 32(4):529-48. PubMed ID: 9327817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Key neurological impairments influence function-related group outcomes after stroke.
    Han L; Law-Gibson D; Reding M
    Stroke; 2002 Jul; 33(7):1920-4. PubMed ID: 12105376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury.
    Houlden H; Edwards M; McNeil J; Greenwood R
    Clin Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 20(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 16541936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Length of stay of stroke rehabilitation inpatients: prediction through the functional independence measure.
    Franchignoni F; Tesio L; Martino MT; Benevolo E; Castagna M
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1998; 34(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 10234877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The functional independence measure in Sweden: experience for outcome measurement in rehabilitation medicine.
    Grimby G; Gudjonsson G; Rodhe M; Sunnerhagen KS; Sundh V; Ostensson ML
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1996 May; 28(2):51-62. PubMed ID: 8815989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impairment-specific dimensions within the Functional Independence Measure.
    Stineman MG; Jette A; Fiedler R; Granger C
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Jun; 78(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 9196472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Racial/ethnic differences in FIM scores and length of stay for underinsured patients undergoing stroke inpatient rehabilitation.
    Chiou-Tan FY; Keng MJ; Graves DE; Chan KT; Rintala DH
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 May; 85(5):415-23. PubMed ID: 16628148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discharge destination and motor function outcome in severe stroke as measured by the functional independence measure/function-related group classification system.
    Sandstrom R; Mokler PJ; Hoppe KM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Jul; 79(7):762-5. PubMed ID: 9685088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impairment and disability: their relation during stroke rehabilitation.
    Roth EJ; Heinemann AW; Lovell LL; Harvey RL; McGuire JR; Diaz S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Mar; 79(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 9523787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure.
    Granger CV; Hamilton BB; Linacre JM; Heinemann AW; Wright BD
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Apr; 72(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 8476548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional task benchmarks for stroke rehabilitation.
    Stineman MG; Fiedler RC; Granger CV; Maislin G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 May; 79(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 9596388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in impairment and disability from the third to the sixth month after stroke and its relationship evaluated by an artificial neural network.
    Sonoda S; Chino N; Domen K; Saitoh E
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1997; 76(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 9354494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.