These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7993605)

  • 1. Base deflection and microleakage of composite restorations.
    Paulillo LA; de Goes MF; Consani S
    Am J Dent; 1994 Jun; 7(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 7993605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
    Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of three cement bases.
    Heys RJ; Fitzgerald M
    J Dent Res; 1991 Jan; 70(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1991861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory study of the Herculite XR system.
    Kamel FM; Retief DH; Mandras RS; Russell CM
    Am J Dent; 1990 Dec; 3(6):271-7. PubMed ID: 2095807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of a pressure chamber to compare microleakage of three luting agents.
    Lyons KM; Rodda JC; Hood JA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):426-33. PubMed ID: 9495161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of the marginal microleakage of six cements in fixed provisional crowns.
    Baldissara P; Comin G; Martone F; Scotti R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 9791787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of incremental versus bulk fill techniques on the microleakage of composite resin using a glass-ionomer liner.
    Puckett A; Fitchie J; Hembree J; Smith J
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):186-91. PubMed ID: 1289865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.