These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7994013)
1. New instrumentation and technique for obtaining consistent interproximal contacts of direct Class II composite restorations. Slone CE Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1994; 6(5):15-20; quiz 22. PubMed ID: 7994013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An effective technique for extended proximal contacts in composite resin restorations. Lacy AM Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 8(3):287-93; quiz 295. PubMed ID: 9028283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations. Prakki A; Cilli R; Saad JO; Rodrigues JR Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 15553286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts. Rada RE Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations. Saber MH; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA; Ahmed DR; Dörfer CE; El Zohairy A Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21740239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques. El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro. Hofmann N; Hunecke A Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bite-formed posterior resin composite restorations, placed with a self-etching primer and a novel matrix. Bertolotti RL; Laamanen H Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):419-22. PubMed ID: 10635278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoration techniques and marginal overhang in Class II composite resin restorations. Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MC J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 19524348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations. Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique. Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up. van Dijken JW J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Establishing approximal contacts in Class 2 composite resin restorations. Doukoudakis S Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):182-4. PubMed ID: 9484169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of various placement techniques on the microhardness of Class II (slot) resin composite restorations. Moosavi H; Abedini S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Sep; 10(5):E009-16. PubMed ID: 19838605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Duplicating the form and function of posterior teeth with Class II resin-based composite. Christensen JJ Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):104-8; quiz 109-10. PubMed ID: 22414503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings. Demarco FF; Cenci MS; Lima FG; Donassollo TA; André Dde A; Leida FL J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 17034926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]