These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7994322)

  • 1. Valuing future benefits.
    Cairns JA
    Health Econ; 1994; 3(4):221-9. PubMed ID: 7994322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discounting and health benefits.
    Parsonage M; Neuburger H
    Health Econ; 1992 Apr; 1(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 1342633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discounting life-years: whither time preference?
    Gyrd-Hansen D; Søgaard J
    Health Econ; 1998 Mar; 7(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 9565168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discounting and health benefits: another perspective.
    Cairns J
    Health Econ; 1992 Apr; 1(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 1342634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time preference, time discounting, and smoking decisions.
    Khwaja A; Silverman D; Sloan F
    J Health Econ; 2007 Sep; 26(5):927-49. PubMed ID: 17574694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social time preferences for health and money elicited with a choice experiment.
    Meerding WJ; Bonsel GJ; Brouwer WB; Stuifbergen MC; Essink-Bot ML
    Value Health; 2010; 13(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 20070639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Private and social time preferences for health and money: an empirical estimation.
    Lazaro A; Barberan R; Rubio E
    Health Econ; 2001 Jun; 10(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 11400257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On what basis should health be discounted?
    Olsen JA
    J Health Econ; 1993 Apr; 12(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 10126489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time preferences for health gains: an empirical investigation.
    Olsen JA
    Health Econ; 1993 Oct; 2(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 8275171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views.
    Lees A; Scott N; Scott SN; MacDonald S; Campbell C
    Health Expect; 2002 Mar; 5(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11906541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Negative and zero time preference for health.
    Van Der Pol MM; Cairns JA
    Health Econ; 2000 Mar; 9(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 10721018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rationing in the NHS: the dance of the seven veils-in reverse.
    Klein R; Day P; Redmayne S
    Br Med Bull; 1995 Oct; 51(4):769-80. PubMed ID: 8556286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Forecasting the economic effects of the aging population].
    Blanchet D; Kessler D
    Econ Stat; 1990 Jun; (233):9-17, 86, 88. PubMed ID: 12316433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health care rationing: the public's perspective.
    Immerwahr J
    EBRI Issue Brief; 1993 Apr; (136):18-22. PubMed ID: 10129614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who are your public? A survey comparing the views of a population-based sample with those of a community-based public forum in Scotland.
    Emslie MJ; Andrew J; Angus V; Entwistle V; Walker K
    Health Soc Care Community; 2005 Mar; 13(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15717918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining preferences for allocating health care gains.
    Mooney G; Jan S; Wiseman V
    Health Care Anal; 1995 Aug; 3(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 10151647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Private and social time preference for health outcomes: A general population survey in Iran.
    Mahboub-Ahari A; Pourreza A; Akbari Sari A; Sheldon TA; Moeeni M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211545. PubMed ID: 30707731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stated time preferences for health: a systematic review and meta analysis of private and social discount rates.
    Mahboub-Ahari A; Pourreza A; Sari AA; Rahimi Foroushani A; Heydari H
    J Res Health Sci; 2014; 14(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 25209903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices: A partial explanation of why Oregon's cost-effectiveness list failed.
    Ubel PA; Loewenstein G; Scanlon D; Kamlet M
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 8778528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spain's citizens assess their health care system.
    Blendon RJ; Donelan K; Jovell AJ; Pellisé L; Lombardia EC
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1991; 10(3):216-28. PubMed ID: 1748379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.