These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7994949)

  • 1. Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Murray PB; Rand JA; Hanssen AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Dec; (309):116-23. PubMed ID: 7994949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.
    Peters CL; Hennessey R; Barden RM; Galante JO; Rosenberg AG
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 9458255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup.
    Berger RA; Nedeff DD; Barden RM; Sheinkop MM; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Oct; (367):50-60. PubMed ID: 10546598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noncemented revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Mow CS; Wiedel JD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Dec; (309):110-5. PubMed ID: 7994948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision TKA with a condylar constrained prosthesis using metaphyseal and surface cementation: a minimum 6-year follow-up analysis.
    Sanz-Ruiz P; Villanueva-Martínez M; Matas-Diez JA; Vaquero-Martín J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():39. PubMed ID: 25888058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.
    Pulido L; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Stuart MJ; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 24687433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 30-mm cemented stem extension provides adequate fixation of the tibial component in revision knee arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 24554459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
    Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cemented all polyethylene tibial components in patients age 75 years and older.
    Pagnano MW; Levy BA; Berry DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Oct; (367):73-80. PubMed ID: 10546600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybrid component fixation in total knee arthroplasty: minimum of 10-year follow-up study.
    Yang JH; Yoon JR; Oh CH; Kim TS
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1111-8. PubMed ID: 22019322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mid- to long-term results of revision total knee replacement using press-fit intramedullary stems with cemented femoral and tibial components.
    Manopoulos P; Havet E; Pearce O; Lardanchet JF; Mertl P
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jul; 94(7):937-40. PubMed ID: 22733949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ICLH replacement of the knee: 1977 and 1978.
    Moreland JR; Thomas RJ; Freeman MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1979; (145):47-59. PubMed ID: 535289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Uncemented knee prosthesis. Results apropos of 58 cases with a minimum of 5-year follow-up].
    Gacon G; Coillard JY; Barba L; Travers V
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 8560021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cemented total knee arthroplasty for gonarthrosis in patients 55 years old or younger.
    Stern SH; Bowen MK; Insall JN; Scuderi GR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Nov; (260):124-9. PubMed ID: 2225614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Whaley AL; Trousdale RT; Rand JA; Hanssen AD
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Aug; 18(5):592-9. PubMed ID: 12934211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Barrack RL; Rorabeck C; Burt M; Sawhney J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Oct; (367):216-25. PubMed ID: 10546618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of modern technique on long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty.
    Ranawat CS; Flynn WF; Deshmukh RG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Dec; (309):131-5. PubMed ID: 7994951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cementless reconstruction of massive tibial bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Whiteside LA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Nov; (248):80-6. PubMed ID: 2805500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pain associated with cemented and uncemented long-stemmed tibial components in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Larson DJ; Rosenberg JH; Lawlor MA; Garvin KL; Hartman CW; Lyden E; Konigsberg BS
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):165-170. PubMed ID: 34053295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty using the condylar constrained prosthesis: an average 5-year follow-up.
    Hartford JM; Goodman SB; Schurman DJ; Knoblick G
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jun; 13(4):380-7. PubMed ID: 9645517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.