These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7995469)

  • 1. Confirmation of Leinfelder clinical wear standards.
    Bayne SC; Taylor DF; Rekow ED; Wilder AD; Heymann HO
    Dent Mater; 1994 Jan; 10(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 7995469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation of M-L, Leinfelder, and USPHS clinical evaluation techniques for wear.
    Taylor DF; Bayne SC; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Dent Mater; 1990 Jul; 6(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 2150823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical wear of three posterior composites.
    Mair LH; Vowles RW; Cunningham J; Williams DF
    Br Dent J; 1990 Dec 8-22; 169(11):355-60. PubMed ID: 2275836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [An in vitro model for the simulation of approximal wear].
    Schmidlin PR; Pasqualetti T; Imfeld T; Besek M
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2003; 113(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 12768888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for analyzing wear of posterior composite restorations.
    Taylor DF; Bayne SC; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Dent Mater; 1989 May; 5(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 2637210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    Am J Dent; 1995 Aug; 8(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 7576382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear.
    Peters MC; Delong R; Pintado MR; Pallesen U; Qvist V; Douglas WH
    J Dent; 1999 Sep; 27(7):479-85. PubMed ID: 10507203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wear measurements in clinical studies of composite resin restorations in the posterior region: a review.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(2):109-23. PubMed ID: 2050870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Composite resins in the 21st century.
    Willems G; Lambrechts P; Braem M; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Sep; 24(9):641-58. PubMed ID: 8272502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year clinical study of u.v.-polymerized posterior composites.
    Wilder AD; Bayne SC; May KN; Leinfelder KF; Taylor DF
    J Dent; 1991 Aug; 19(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 1787209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wear patterns in two amalgams and three posterior composites after 5 years' clinical service.
    Mair LH
    J Dent; 1995 Apr; 23(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7738266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Composite restoration wear analysis: conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer.
    Perry R; Kugel G; Kunzelmann KH; Flessa HP; Estafan D
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Oct; 131(10):1472-7. PubMed ID: 11042988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and profilometric wear measurements.
    Söderholm KJ; Roberts MJ; Antonson DE; Anusavice KJ; Mauderli AP; Sarrett DC; Warren JW
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Apr; 50(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 1604966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness.
    Mörmann WH; Stawarczyk B; Ender A; Sener B; Attin T; Mehl A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Apr; 20():113-25. PubMed ID: 23455168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 3-year clinical evaluation of two composite resins in class-II cavities.
    Rasmusson CG; Köhler B; Odman P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1998 Apr; 56(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 9669456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical performance of posterior composite resin restorations.
    Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Gordon GE; Powell LV
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Oct; 23(10):705-11. PubMed ID: 1289954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wear of opposing teeth by posterior composite resins--evaluation of newly developed wear test methods.
    Shimane T; Endo K; Zheng JH; Yanagi T; Ohno H
    Dent Mater J; 2010 Nov; 29(6):713-20. PubMed ID: 21099153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Gautschi L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Sep; 72(3):233-44. PubMed ID: 7965895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal micromorphological 15-year results of posterior composite restorations using three-dimensional scanning electron microscopy.
    Dietz W; Montag R; Kraft U; Walther M; Sigusch BW; Gaengler P
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):959-69. PubMed ID: 24814136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.