These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7995474)

  • 21. A novel comonomer-free light-cured glass-ionomer cement for reduced cytotoxicity and enhanced mechanical strength.
    Xie D; Yang Y; Zhao J; Park JG; Zhang JT
    Dent Mater; 2007 Aug; 23(8):994-1003. PubMed ID: 17049978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term strength of aesthetic restoratives.
    Frankel N; Pearson GJ; Labella R
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Feb; 25(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 9576590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 1833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diametral tensile strength and bonding to dentin of type I glass ionomer cements.
    Galun EA; Saleh N; Lewinstein I
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 7990049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the shear bond strength of a titanium composite resin material with dentinal bonding agents versus glass ionomer cements.
    Cohen BI; Condos S; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):904-9. PubMed ID: 1494117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A novel hyperbranched poly(acrylic acid) for improved resin-modified glass-ionomer restoratives.
    Zhao J; Xie D
    Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 21377199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retention of posts with resin, glass ionomer and hybrid cements.
    Love RM; Purton DG
    J Dent; 1998 Sep; 26(7):599-602. PubMed ID: 9754749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Flexural properties of resin-modified "hybrid" glass-ionomers in comparison with conventional acid-base glass-ionomers.
    Momoi Y; Hirosaki K; Kohno A; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater J; 1995 Dec; 14(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 8940550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modification of conventional glass-ionomer cements with N-vinylpyrrolidone containing polyacids, nano-hydroxy and fluoroapatite to improve mechanical properties.
    Moshaverinia A; Ansari S; Movasaghi Z; Billington RW; Darr JA; Rehman IU
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1381-90. PubMed ID: 18433855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of glass-ionomers for bracket bonding--an ex vivo study evaluating a testing device for in vivo purposes.
    Ortendahl TW; Thilander B
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Apr; 20(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 9633174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bond strengths of orthodontic bonding materials: an in-vitro study.
    Fox NA; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 1911690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials.
    Cho E; Kopel H; White SN
    Quintessence Int; 1995 May; 26(5):351-8. PubMed ID: 7568759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Flexural strength and modulus of a novel ceramic restorative cement intended for posterior restorations as determined by a three-point bending test.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Peutzfeldt A; van Dijken JW
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2003 Apr; 61(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 12790505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of mechanical properties of five cements for orthodontic band cementation.
    Aguiar DA; Ritter DE; Rocha R; Locks A; Borgatto AF
    Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 23459769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
    Pilo R; Nissan J; Shafir H; Shapira G; Alter E; Brosh T
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage on retentive strengths of luting cements for zirconia crowns.
    Ehlers V; Kampf G; Stender E; Willershausen B; Ernst CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 25794911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements.
    Mitchell CA; Douglas WH; Cheng YS
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10483390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.