268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7995482)
1. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study.
Hallett KB; Garcia-Godoy F
Dent Mater; 1993 Sep; 9(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 7995482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
Bansal D; Mahajan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage on Class V glass ionomer restorations after cavity preparation with aluminum oxide air abrasion.
Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Rocha RA; Palma-Dibb RG
Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16113931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.
Haller B; Trojanski A
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 9927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted primary molars.
Wadenya RO; Yego C; Mante FK
J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 20359427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage and marginal gap formation of glass ionomer resin restorations.
Salama FS; Riad MI; Abdel Megid FY
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8634192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars.
Wadenya R; Mante FK
Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 17867395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope.
Niranjan B; Shashikiran ND; Singla S; Thakur R; Dubey A; Maran S
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 27681395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials.
Bouschlicher MR; Vargas MA; Denehy GE
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):90-5. PubMed ID: 9002867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentin surface treatments and glass ionomer microleakage.
Pachuta SM; Meiers JC
Am J Dent; 1995 Aug; 8(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 7576385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of microleakage among three different glass ionomer types.
Abd El Halim S; Zaki D
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 21488727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
