These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7995697)
1. Comparison between fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo imaging of normal and abnormal musculoskeletal structures in children and young adults. Jaramillo D; Laor T; Mulkern RV Invest Radiol; 1994 Sep; 29(9):803-11. PubMed ID: 7995697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR diagnosis of bone contusions of the knee: comparison of coronal T2-weighted fast spin-echo with fat saturation and fast spin-echo STIR images with conventional STIR images. Arndt WF; Truax AL; Barnett FM; Simmons GE; Brown DC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 8571859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal lesions: comparison of three fat-saturation pulse sequences. Pui MH; Goh PS; Choo HF; Fok EC Australas Radiol; 1997 May; 41(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 9153802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of bone contusions with fat-saturated fast spin-echo proton-density magnetic resonance imaging. Lal NR; Jamadar DA; Doi K; Newman JS; Adler RS; Uri DS; Kazerooni EA Can Assoc Radiol J; 2000 Jun; 51(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 10914084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Magnetic resonance tomography of the locomotor system with rapid image sequences]. Glückert K; Kladny B Orthopade; 1989 Feb; 18(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 2704556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences. Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging. Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fast spin-echo inversion-recovery imaging versus fast T2-weighted spin-echo imaging in bone marrow abnormalities. Hilfiker P; Zanetti M; Debatin JF; McKinnon G; Hodler J Invest Radiol; 1995 Feb; 30(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 7654279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. T2-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen: fast spin-echo vs conventional spin-echo sequences. Catasca JV; Mirowitz SA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 8273691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of HASTE and segmented-HASTE sequences with a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence in the screening evaluation of the brain. Sugahara T; Korogi Y; Hirai T; Hamatake S; Ikushima I; Shigematu Y; Takahashi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1401-10. PubMed ID: 9353469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fat-suppressed MR of the orbit and cavernous sinus: comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo. Mukherji SK; Tart RP; Fitzsimmons J; Belden C; McGorray S; Guy J; Mancuso AA AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Oct; 15(9):1707-14. PubMed ID: 7847218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Musculoskeletal MR imaging: turbo (fast) spin-echo versus conventional spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging at 0.5 tesla. Vahlensieck M; Lang P; Seelos K; Yang-Ho Sze D; Grampp S; Reiser M Skeletal Radiol; 1994 Nov; 23(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 7886469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images. Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of the knee: Improvement of signal and contrast efficiency of T1-weighted turbo spin echo sequences by applying a driven equilibrium (DRIVE) pulse. Radlbauer R; Lomoschitz F; Salomonowitz E; Eberhardt KE; Stadlbauer A Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):e82-7. PubMed ID: 20096521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fast spin-echo MR in the detection of vertebral metastases: comparison of three sequences. Jones KM; Schwartz RB; Mantello MT; Ahn SS; Khorasani R; Mukherji S; Oshio K; Mulkern RV AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Mar; 15(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 8197934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous Multislice Accelerated Turbo Spin Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison and Combination With In-Plane Parallel Imaging Acceleration for High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee. Fritz J; Fritz B; Zhang J; Thawait GK; Joshi DH; Pan L; Wang D Invest Radiol; 2017 Sep; 52(9):529-537. PubMed ID: 28430716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging of the liver: breath-hold fast spin-echo versus non-breath-hold fast spin-echo images with and without fat suppression. Soyer P; Le Normand S; de Givry SC; Gueye C; Somveille E; Scherrer A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Mar; 166(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 8623633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness of the fast spin-echo three-point Dixon (mDixon) image of the knee joint on 3.0-T MRI: comparison with conventional fast spin-echo T2 weighted image. Park HJ; Lee SY; Rho MH; Chung EC; Ahn JH; Park JH; Lee IS Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20151074. PubMed ID: 27008281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]