These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7995709)

  • 21. Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.
    Ernst AA; Fish S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1050-5. PubMed ID: 16264073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The misused impact factor.
    Simons K
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):165. PubMed ID: 18845714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. NIH peer review: time for some changes.
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 May; 16(5):395. PubMed ID: 9592372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
    Jones AW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.
    Kearney MH; Freda MC
    Res Nurs Health; 2005 Dec; 28(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 16287058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gulf syndrome research has passed peer review.
    Haley RW
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6830):739. PubMed ID: 11298408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.
    Shaller D
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 2):217-27. PubMed ID: 14702504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ecstasy agonistes: a retracted study on a controversial substance raises questions about the reliability of government-sponsored research on drugs.
    Bartlett T
    Chron High Educ; 2004 Feb; 50(25):A14-6. PubMed ID: 15287142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring the value and impact of health library and information services: past reflections, future possibilities.
    Marshall JG
    Health Info Libr J; 2007 Dec; 24 Suppl 1():4-17. PubMed ID: 18005291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Funding and publishing trends of original research by emergency medicine investigators over the past decade.
    Birkhahn RH; Van Deusen SK; Okpara OI; Datillo PA; Briggs WM; Gaeta TJ
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Jan; 13(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 16365335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of masking manuscripts for the peer-review process of an ophthalmic journal.
    Isenberg SJ; Sanchez E; Zafran KC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 93(7):881-4. PubMed ID: 19211602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics.
    Dulai SK; Slobogean BL; Beauchamp RD; Mulpuri K
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2007; 27(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 17585270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing prevention research impact: a bibliometric analysis.
    Franks AL; Simoes EJ; Singh R; Sajor Gray B
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Mar; 30(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 16476636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neutralizing the impact factor culture.
    Notkins AL
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):191. PubMed ID: 18845731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Research on cancer diagnosis in Malaysia: current status.
    Looi LM; Zubaidah Z; Cheah PL; Cheong SK; Gudum HR; Iekhsan O; Ikram SI; Jamal R; Mak JW; Othman NH; Puteri JN; Rosline H; Sabariah AR; Seow HF; Sharifah NA;
    Malays J Pathol; 2004 Jun; 26(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 16190103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Peer review as professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants.
    Grainger DW
    Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(34):5199-203. PubMed ID: 17643484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval.
    Greene SM; Geiger AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):784-90. PubMed ID: 16828670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.