228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7996114)
1. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the modified double-flared technique.
Saunders WP; Saunders EM
J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 7996114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
Saunders WP; Saunders EM
J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of Flex-R files and K-type files for enlargement of severely curved molar root canals.
Sepic AO; Pantera EA; Neaverth EJ; Anderson RW
J Endod; 1989 Jun; 15(6):240-5. PubMed ID: 2592877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-force instrumentation with three different file types.
Royal JR; Donnelly JC
J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):300-4. PubMed ID: 7673837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting the apical constriction in curved mandibular molar roots--preflared versus nonflared canals.
Khan IU; Sobhi MB
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2003; 15(3):47-9. PubMed ID: 14727341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Barbakow F; Peters OA
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):456-64. PubMed ID: 15946266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals.
Gordon MP; Love RM; Chandler NP
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15667630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Preparation of curved root canals using hand instruments and mechanical aids].
Hülsmann M; Bertzbach F
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 2630269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
Cheung GS; Chan AW
J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the performance of four files with rounded tips during shaping of simulated root canals.
Dummer PM; al-Omari MA; Bryant S
J Endod; 1998 May; 24(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 9641115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Root and canal morphology of the mesiobuccal and distal roots of permanent first molars in a Kuwait population--a clinical study.
Pattanshetti N; Gaidhane M; Al Kandari AM
Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):755-62. PubMed ID: 18637850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of maintaining apical patency on canal transportation.
Tsesis I; Amdor B; Tamse A; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 18312378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
