These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Management considerations of the Humphrey Vision Analyzer. Elmstrom G J Am Optom Assoc; 1977 Oct; 48(10):1293-9. PubMed ID: 332754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-assisted eye examination. I. Computer-actuated eye refractors. Marg E Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1973 Aug; 50(8):601-15. PubMed ID: 4583041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical evaluation of the Dioptron II Ultima B]. Risse JF; Villard C; Carre H Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1983 Oct; 83(10):1179-84. PubMed ID: 6679824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The IVEX refraction system: a clinical comparison. Roggenkamp JR; Richardson NL; Krebsbach JB; Yolton RL J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Jul; 56(7):532-6. PubMed ID: 4020006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of an automatic refraction device in a Third World country. Garner LF; Kinnear RF; Klinger JD; Jones J J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Jul; 56(7):538-41. PubMed ID: 3874895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An automatic objective optometer. Description and clinical evaluation. Polse DA; Kerr KE Arch Ophthalmol; 1975 Mar; 93(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 1094996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Traditional versus computer-assisted refraction: "which is better?". Borish IM; Catania LJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):749-56. PubMed ID: 9635380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value and reliability of an automatic objective refractometer: the Dioptron Nova. A statistical study on computer of 600 measures]. Poletti J; Courrejou C Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1985 Apr; 85(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 3830459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Optometrists' human and computer assistants. Marg E; Ng R J Occup Med; 1972 May; 14(5):357-62. PubMed ID: 4555123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-assisted eye examination. V. Preliminary evaluation of the refractor III system for subjective examination. Marg E; Johnson DE; Anderson KW; Baker RL; Neroth CC Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 Jan; 54(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 324290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The AP-94 device for examination of ocular refraction]. Volkov BP; Ponkratov AN; Skvortsov IuS; Tregub VP; Shmidt ER Med Tekh; 1997; (1):47-8. PubMed ID: 9148079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advantages of the keratometer in refraction. PLATT BG U S Armed Forces Med J; 1954 Jun; 5(6):899-900. PubMed ID: 13169461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an objective acuity device. Millodot M; Miller D; Jernigan ME Arch Ophthalmol; 1973 Dec; 90(6):449-52. PubMed ID: 4759430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Optometry with the use of diminution of the retinal image by distancing the test to the examined subject]. Kedzia B; Jasińska J; Wrocławski J Klin Oczna; 1982; 84(1-2):9-11. PubMed ID: 7132214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical evaluation of the american optical SR III subjective refractor. Perrigin DM; Perrigin J; Grosvenor T Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1981 Jul; 58(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 7282870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The clinical trial of a prototype of the new LAR-2 serially produced laser optometer]. Rozenblium IuZ; Avetisov VE; Maksudova ZN Vestn Oftalmol; 1993; 109(4):28-30. PubMed ID: 8279102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]