703 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7996527)
1. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal.
Schwartz RO
J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 7996527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.
Jaturasrivilai P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 May; 90(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 17596034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of different laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.
Hobson DT; Imudia AN; Al-Safi ZA; Shade G; Kruger M; Diamond MP; Awonuga AO
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 May; 285(5):1353-61. PubMed ID: 22124531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.
Nezhat F; Nezhat C; Gordon S; Wilkins E
J Reprod Med; 1992 Mar; 37(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 1532990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
Drahonovsky J; Haakova L; Otcenasek M; Krofta L; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19926201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Individual physician experience with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy in a single outpatient setting.
McClellan SN; Hamilton B; Rettenmaier MA; Lopez K; John CR; Hu JC; Goldstein BH
Surg Innov; 2007 Jun; 14(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 17558015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experience with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged uterus.
Ark C; Güngördük K; Celebi I; Celikkol O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19184075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. A suitable substitute for abdominal hysterectomy?
Lowell L; Kessler AA
J Reprod Med; 2000 Sep; 45(9):738-42. PubMed ID: 11027083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy in the management of menorrhagia: 400 consecutive cases.
Erian J; Hassan M; Pachydakis A; Chandakas S; Wissa I; Hill N
BJOG; 2008 May; 115(6):742-8. PubMed ID: 18410659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy at a health maintenance organization. Cost-effectiveness and comparison with total abdominal hysterectomy.
Bornstein SJ; Shaber RE
J Reprod Med; 1995 Jun; 40(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 7650655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
El-Mowafi D; Madkour W; Lall C; Wenger JM
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 May; 11(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15200770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intramyometrial injection of vasopressin in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
Ghomi A; Makhlouf F; Kasturi S; Einarsson JI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 18312990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical assessment for three routes of hysterectomy.
Zhu L; Lang JH; Liu CY; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Fan R
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 19302739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Schedule effect and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
Chang WC; Lin CC; Chen LM; Wu HD; Yeh LS; Lin LY
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Aug; 48(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 18837852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.
Jackson KS; Das N; Naik R; Lopes AD; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH; Monaghan JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 15581978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
